Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28608164›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2017

Impact of multidetector computed tomography on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis.

S Schleder, L Luerken, L M Dendl, A Redel, M Selgrad, P Renner, C Stroszczynski, A G Schreyer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

S SchlederDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. stephan.schleder@ukr.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7785-3015
L LuerkenDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
L M DendlDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
A RedelDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
M SelgradDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
P RennerDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
C StroszczynskiDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
A G SchreyerDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Centre Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
University Hospital Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the impact of CT scans on diagnosis or change of therapy in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis and obscure clinical infection.

methodsCT records of patients with obscure clinical infection and SIRS or sepsis were retrospectively evaluated. Both confirmation of and changes in the diagnosis or therapy based on CT findings were analysed by means of the hospital information system and radiological information system. A sub-group analysis included differences with regard to anatomical region, medical history and referring department.

resultsOf 525 consecutive patients evaluated, 59% had been referred from internal medicine and 41% from surgery. CT examination had confirmed the suspected diagnosis in 26% and had resulted in a different diagnosis in 33% and a change of therapy in 32%. Abdominal scans yielded a significantly higher (p=0.013) change of therapy rate (42%) than thoracic scans (22%). Therapy was changed significantly more often (p=0.016) in surgical patients (38%) than in patients referred from internal medicine (28%).

conclusionsCT examination for detecting an unknown infection focus in patients with SIRS or sepsis is highly beneficial and should be conducted in patients with obscure clinical infection. KEY POINTS: • Evaluation of patients with obscure clinical infection is a challenging task. • CT examination of patients with SIRS or sepsis seems to be beneficial. • CT examination confirmed suspected diagnosis in 26% of patients. • CT examination yielded a new infection focus in 33% of patients. • CT examination changed therapy in up to 32% of patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyRetrospective StudiesSepsisSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeComputed tomographyInfectionInfection controlSepsisSystemic inflammatory response syndrome

Identifiers

PMID28608164
OpenAlexW2626987651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.