ArticleEuropean radiology2017
Impact of multidetector computed tomography on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis.
Article in European radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Planning and performing CT-guided interventions for source control in septic patients: a survey by the European Society of Emergency Radiology.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Contrast-enhanced CT in sepsis: insights from a European Emergency Radiology survey.European radiology · 2026Article
- Searching for Infectious Foci in Intensive Care Patients: Diagnostic Yield of Computed Tomography and Prognostic Value of Clinical and Laboratory Chemical Parameters.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Critical reflection on the indication for computed tomography: an interdisciplinary survey of risk and benefit management in patients with sepsis.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Trends in CT examination utilization in the emergency department during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Computed tomography in patients with sepsis presenting to the emergency department: exploring its role in light of patient outcomes.European radiology · 2024Observational
- Interdisciplinary perspectives on computed tomography in sepsis: survey among medical doctors at a large university medical center.European radiology · 2023Article
- Final-year medical students' perspective: a survey on the use of computed tomography in sepsis.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Body computed tomography in sepsis: predictors of CT findings and patient outcomes in a retrospective medical ICU cohort study.Emergency radiology · 2022Article
- Cerebrovascular Events in Suspected Sepsis: Retrospective Prevalence Study in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Full-Body Computed Tomography.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the impact of CT scans on diagnosis or change of therapy in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis and obscure clinical infection.
methodsCT records of patients with obscure clinical infection and SIRS or sepsis were retrospectively evaluated. Both confirmation of and changes in the diagnosis or therapy based on CT findings were analysed by means of the hospital information system and radiological information system. A sub-group analysis included differences with regard to anatomical region, medical history and referring department.
resultsOf 525 consecutive patients evaluated, 59% had been referred from internal medicine and 41% from surgery. CT examination had confirmed the suspected diagnosis in 26% and had resulted in a different diagnosis in 33% and a change of therapy in 32%. Abdominal scans yielded a significantly higher (p=0.013) change of therapy rate (42%) than thoracic scans (22%). Therapy was changed significantly more often (p=0.016) in surgical patients (38%) than in patients referred from internal medicine (28%).
conclusionsCT examination for detecting an unknown infection focus in patients with SIRS or sepsis is highly beneficial and should be conducted in patients with obscure clinical infection. KEY POINTS: • Evaluation of patients with obscure clinical infection is a challenging task. • CT examination of patients with SIRS or sepsis seems to be beneficial. • CT examination confirmed suspected diagnosis in 26% of patients. • CT examination yielded a new infection focus in 33% of patients. • CT examination changed therapy in up to 32% of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.