ReviewDer Internist2017
[Dyspnea].
Review in Der Internist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Coronavirus Infection on Health-Related Quality of Life in Amateur CrossFit Athletes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Dyspnea and COVID-19: A Review of Confounding Diagnoses during the Postpartum Period.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dyspnea represents one of the most frequent cardinal symptoms in general practice and interdisciplinary emergency care across all sectors. Due to its subjective character, dyspnea is described by patients in many different ways, including "shortness of breath, difficulty of breathing, feeling of chest tightness, etc". The spectrum of differential diagnoses is broad, including in particular pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases. In addition to an evaluation of severity and an assessment of temporal, situation-related, and causal classification criteria, a structured process of multiple diagnostic steps in both primary and emergency care is a prerequisite for fast and correct diagnosis. In this context, it is of crucial importance to identify life-threatening diseases according to defined criteria and thus initiate adequate emergency measures. Further treatment options at the interface between primary and clinical care can be based on the German Appropriate Evaluation Protocol (G-AEP) criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28608125What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.