Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28608041›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2017

Laparoscopic Lavage in the Management of Perforated Diverticulitis: a Contemporary Meta-analysis.

Norman Galbraith, Jane V Carter, Uri Netz, Dongyan Yang, Donald E Fry, Michael McCafferty, Susan Galandiuk

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Long-Term Results After Laparoscopic Lavage for Perforated Diverticulitis Purulent Peritonitis in Sweden: A Population-Based Observational Study.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Short and Long-Term Stoma Rate in Laparoscopic Lavage Versus Resection in Perforated Diverticulitis: Different Outcomes, Same Results?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Norman GalbraithPrice Institute of Surgical Research, The Hiram C. Polk, Jr., M.D. Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA.
Jane V CarterPrice Institute of Surgical Research, The Hiram C. Polk, Jr., M.D. Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA.
Uri NetzPrice Institute of Surgical Research, The Hiram C. Polk, Jr., M.D. Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA.
Dongyan YangDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Donald E FryClinical Outcomes Management, MPA Healthcare Solutions, 1 East Wacker Drive, no. 1210, Chicago, IL, 60601, USA.
Michael McCaffertyRobley Rex Veterans Administration Medical Center, Louisville, KY, 40206, USA.
Susan GalandiukPrice Institute of Surgical Research, The Hiram C. Polk, Jr., M.D. Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, 40292, USA. s0gala01@louisville.edu.
University of Louisville · USLouisville VA Medical Center · USNorthwestern University · USRice Institute · USSoroka Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importancePerforated diverticulitis carries the risk of significant comorbidity and mortality. Although colon resection provides adequate source control, the procedure itself carries morbidity, as well as later stoma reversal procedures. The effectiveness of laparoscopic lavage to treat perforated diverticulitis remains unclear.

objectiveWe aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate current studies comparing laparoscopic lavage with colon resection in cases of perforated diverticulitis for the effectiveness in source control, without the need for subsequent interventions, stoma formation, and death. DATA SOURCES: Electronic database searches were conducted using EMBASE, Pubmed, CINAHL, Cochrane databases, and clinicaltrials.gov following PRISMA guidelines. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included that compared laparoscopic lavage against colon resection for perforated diverticulitis. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Risk of bias in RCT's was assessed the Cochrane Assessment of Bias risk tool and Jadad scale. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effects risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN OUTCOME: Outcome measures included the total rate of reoperation, rate of reoperation for infection, need for subsequent percutaneous drainage, stoma formation, and mortality rate within 90 days.

resultsThree eligible randomized controlled studies were identified, with a combined total of 372 patients. Laparoscopic lavage carried an increased rate of total reoperations (RR 2.07; CI 1.12-3.84; p = 0.021) and an increased rate of reoperation for infection (RR 5.56; CI 1.97-15.69; p = 0.001) compared with colon resection. In addition, laparoscopic lavage increased the rate of subsequent percutaneous drainage (RR 6.54; CI 1.77-24.16; p = 0.005) compared with colon resection, but a lesser risk of stoma formation within 90 days (RR 0.18; CI 0.12-0.27; p < 0.001). No difference in mortality rate was observed between treatments (RR 1.03; CI 0.45-2.34; p = 0.950).

conclusionDespite decreased rates of stoma formation and equivalent mortality rates as compared with colon resection, laparoscopic lavage for Hinchey III diverticulitis fails to completely control the source of infection. Our data show that laparoscopic lavage is associated with increased rates of total reoperations, increased rates of reoperation for infections, and need for subsequent percutaneous drainage.

Indexed as

ColectomyDiverticulitis, ColonicDrainageHumansIntestinal PerforationLaparoscopyPeritoneal LavagePeritonitisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReoperationSurgical StomasColorectal surgeryDiverticulitisHartmann procedureLaparoscopic lavageWashout

Identifiers

PMID28608041
OpenAlexW2626142211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.