ReviewJapanese journal of radiology2017
Value of ultrasonographic evaluation for soft-tissue lesions: focus on incidentally detected lesions on CT/MRI.
Review in Japanese journal of radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation between ultrasound images and gross anatomy of the different strata of the human tongue.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2025Article
- Ultrasound Evaluation of Soft Tissue Masses and Parotid Gland in Clinical Rheumatology.European journal of rheumatology · 2024Article
- Water immersion ultrasound can improve the repeatability of ultrasonic measurement of dorsalis pedis artery diameter and hemodynamic parameters.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- Analysis on diagnostic failure of US-guided core needle biopsy for soft tissue tumors.Research in diagnostic and interventional imaging · 2023Article
- Immersion ultrasonography improves the repeatability of cephalic vein diameter measurements for inexperienced operators.Renal failure · 2022Article
- Ultrasonographic features of uterine cervical lesions.The British journal of radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Soft-tissue lesions of the musculoskeletal system are commonly encountered in clinical practice and often manifest as palpable lesions. Moreover, the increasing use of cross-sectional imaging such as CT or MRI has resulted in the incidental detection of many soft-tissue lesions. Ultrasonography remains the primary imaging investigation for soft-tissue lesions. It has been shown to be helpful in depicting processes involving the soft-tissue lesions on cross-sectional imaging. This article describes the ultrasonographic findings of the most frequently incidentally detected benign and malignant soft-tissue lesions on cross-sectional imaging and suggests the characteristics of such diseases, focusing on the ultrasonographic features that allow accurate diagnosis. Familiarity with the clinical setting and the appearance of soft-tissue lesions on both ultrasonography and cross-sectional imaging can lead to accurate diagnosis and appropriate management of the condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.