Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28607686›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2017

Improving Care for Patients With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease Using Electronic Medical Record Interventions: A Pragmatic Cluster-Randomized Trial Protocol.

Danielle M Nash, Noah M Ivers, Jacqueline Young, R Liisa Jaakkimainen, Amit X Garg, Karen Tu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02274298 (Improving Care for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Using Electronic Medical Record Interventions), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02274298 naunknown statusnot on this map

Improving Care for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Using Electronic Medical Record Interventions: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRan2014 to 2017Enrolled221ConditionsChronic Kidney DiseaseArmsCKD feedback and tools
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle M NashInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Western, London, Ontario, Canada.
Noah M IversInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jacqueline YoungInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
R Liisa JaakkimainenInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amit X GargInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Western, London, Ontario, Canada.
Karen TuInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CALondon Health Sciences Centre · CAMcMaster University · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany patients with or at risk for chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the primary care setting are not receiving recommended care.

objectiveThe objective of this study is to determine whether a multifaceted, low-cost intervention compared with usual care improves the care of patients with or at risk for CKD in the primary care setting.

designA pragmatic cluster-randomized trial, with an embedded qualitative process evaluation, will be conducted.

settingThe study population comes from the Electronic Medical Record Administrative data Linked Database

interventionThe intervention group will receive resources from the "CKD toolkit" to help improve care including practice audit and feedback, printed educational materials for physicians and patients, electronic decision support and reminders, and implementation support. MEASUREMENTS: Patients with or at risk for CKD within participating clinics will be identified using laboratory data in the electronic medical records. Outcomes will be assessed after dissemination of the CKD tools and after 2 rounds of feedback on performance on quality indicators have been sent to the physicians using information from the electronic medical records. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients aged 50 to 80 years with nondialysis-dependent CKD who are on a statin. Secondary outcomes include process of care measures such as screening tests, CKD recognition, monitoring tests, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker prescriptions, blood pressure targets met, and nephrologist referral. Hierarchical analytic modeling will be performed to account for clustering. Semistructured interviews will be conducted with a random purposeful sample of physicians in the intervention group to understand why the intervention achieved the observed effects.

conclusionsIf our intervention improves care, then the CKD toolkit can be adapted and scaled for use in other primary care clinics which use electronic medical records.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02274298.

Indexed as

chronic kidney diseaseclinical decision support systemelectronic medical recordsprimary carequality of care

Identifiers

PMID28607686
PMCPMC5453629
OpenAlexW2605255908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.