ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2017
Report of periprocedural oral anticoagulants in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: The Japanese Catheter Ablation Registry of Atrial Fibrillation (J-CARAF).
Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utilization and complications of catheter ablation therapy for cardiac arrhythmias in congenital heart disease: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Study design of nationwide Japanese Catheter Ablation Registry: Protocol for a prospective, multicenter, open registry.Journal of arrhythmia · 2019Article
- Influence of substrate modification in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation on the incidence of acute complications: Analysis of 10 795 procedures in J-CARAF Study 2011-2016.Journal of arrhythmia · 2018Article
- Comparison of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin regarding midterm adverse events in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation.Journal of arrhythmia · 2018Article
- Uninterrupted dabigatran is safer than warfarin in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation.Journal of arrhythmia · 2017Article
- Incidence and predictors of pericardial effusion as an early complication of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: The Japanese Catheter Ablation Registry of Atrial Fibrillation (J-CARAF).Journal of arrhythmia · 2017Article
- Vagal response in cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation and autonomic nervous system: Utility of epicardial adipose tissue location.Journal of arrhythmia · 2017Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of DOACs in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation: Results from the China Atrial Fibrillation (China-AF) Registry.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo obtain a perspective of the current status of catheter ablation for the cure of atrial fibrillation, the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society conducted a nationwide survey: the Japanese Catheter Ablation Registry of Atrial Fibrillation. In this report, we aimed to evaluate the periprocedural use of direct oral anticoagulants with respect to thromboembolic or bleeding complications.
methodsUsing an online questionnaire, the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society requested electrophysiology centers in Japan to register the relevant data of patients who underwent atrial fibrillation ablation over selected five-months from 2011 to 2014. We compared the clinical profiles and the ablation data, including the incidence of pericardial effusion, major bleeding, and ischemic stroke among patients with periprocedural use of warfarin or a direct oral anticoagulant.
resultsA total of 204 institutions reported data on 6200 atrial fibrillation ablation sessions. We analyzed data obtained from 4698 subjects (Age 63.2±10.6 yr; 73.9% male, 26.1% female) who were administered warfarin or a direct oral anticoagulant, at least up to the day before atrial fibrillation ablation. Warfarin was administered to 54.7% of patients. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban were used in 21.9%, 12.9%, and 10.6% of patients, respectively. Clinical profiles of apixaban-treated patients were similar to those of warfarin-treated patients; they were different from the clinical profiles of patients treated with dabigatran or rivaroxaban. There were 104 complications in 103 subjects (2.2%). Complications were more frequent in older patients (65.3±8.6 yr vs. 63.1±10.7 yr;
conclusionsCompared with uninterrupted warfarin, the choice of a direct oral anticoagulant as a periprocedural oral anticoagulant did not significantly change the incidence of serious complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.