Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28607505›Full record

ReviewThe pharmacogenomics journal2018

Predictive genetic markers in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer: a long way to go. Review of the literature.

M Gusella, E Pezzolo, Y Modena, C Barile, D Menon, G Crepaldi, F La Russa, A P Fraccon, F Pasini

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The pharmacogenomics journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Real-world Scenario: CROSS Regimen as Preoperative Therapy for Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M GusellaLaboratory of Pharmacology and Molecular Biology, Department of Oncology, San Luca Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.
E PezzoloLaboratory of Pharmacology and Molecular Biology, Department of Oncology, San Luca Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.
Y ModenaMedical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.
C BarileMedical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.
D MenonMedical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.
G CrepaldiMedical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.
F La RussaMedical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.
A P FracconMedical Oncology Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda (Verona), Italy.
F PasiniMedical Oncology Unit, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda (Verona), Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of genetic molecular markers in neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer has been reviewed, focusing strictly on concurrent chemoradiation protocols followed by surgery. Eleven studies evaluated the role of mRNA expression profile; the end point was overall survival (OS) in two studies and different definitions of histological response in nine. Genes reported as significant were involved in cell cycle control (30), apoptosis (7), structural molecules (9), cell metabolism (6) and DNA repair (1). Seven studies reported about 15 microRNA (miRNA) molecules associated with OS (2) or histological response (13), however, defined with different classifications. Their target genes were prevalently involved in cell cycle control (4), apoptosis (1), cell adhesion (1), migration (1) and angiogenesis (1). Gene polymorphisms (single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) have been evaluated in 8 studies reporting 10 variants associated with survival or pathological response. OS was the end point in six of these studies. SNPs reported as significant were involved in DNA repair system (4), detoxification (2), folate metabolism (6), drug efflux (2) and others (2). In a study, a panel including histology, pathological response and five SNPs discriminated two subsets of patients with 5-year survival rates of 79.3% and 26.3% (hazard ratio 6.25, P<0.0001). In another study, combination of stage, grade and 4 miRNAs improved prediction of pathological response (P=10

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsChemoradiotherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsGenetic MarkersHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAntineoplastic AgentsGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID28607505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.