Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28607456›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

An Advanced Deep Learning Approach for Ki-67 Stained Hotspot Detection and Proliferation Rate Scoring for Prognostic Evaluation of Breast Cancer.

Monjoy Saha, Chandan Chakraborty, Indu Arun, Rosina Ahmed, Sanjoy Chatterjee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Automated Molecular Subtyping of Breast Carcinoma Using Deep Learning Techniques.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Pathology of Lung Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monjoy SahaSchool of Medical Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India.
Chandan ChakrabortySchool of Medical Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India. chandanc@smst.iitkgp.ernet.in.
Indu ArunTata Medical Center, New Town, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Rosina AhmedTata Medical Center, New Town, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Sanjoy ChatterjeeTata Medical Center, New Town, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Tata Medical Center · INIndian Institute of Technology Kharagpur · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Being a non-histone protein, Ki-67 is one of the essential biomarkers for the immunohistochemical assessment of proliferation rate in breast cancer screening and grading. The Ki-67 signature is always sensitive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Due to random morphological, color and intensity variations of cell nuclei (immunopositive and immunonegative), manual/subjective assessment of Ki-67 scoring is error-prone and time-consuming. Hence, several machine learning approaches have been reported; nevertheless, none of them had worked on deep learning based hotspots detection and proliferation scoring. In this article, we suggest an advanced deep learning model for computerized recognition of candidate hotspots and subsequent proliferation rate scoring by quantifying Ki-67 appearance in breast cancer immunohistochemical images. Unlike existing Ki-67 scoring techniques, our methodology uses Gamma mixture model (GMM) with Expectation-Maximization for seed point detection and patch selection and deep learning, comprises with decision layer, for hotspots detection and proliferation scoring. Experimental results provide 93% precision, 0.88% recall and 0.91% F-score value. The model performance has also been compared with the pathologists' manual annotations and recently published articles. In future, the proposed deep learning framework will be highly reliable and beneficial to the junior and senior pathologists for fast and efficient Ki-67 scoring.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationDeep LearningBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKi-67 AntigenPathology, ClinicalReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorKi-67 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID28607456
PMCPMC5468356
OpenAlexW2622279389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.