Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28607406›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Distinct activation modes of the Relaxin Family Peptide Receptor 2 in response to insulin-like peptide 3 and relaxin.

Shoni Bruell, Ashish Sethi, Nicholas Smith, Daniel J Scott, Mohammed Akhter Hossain, Qing-Ping Wu, Zhan-Yun Guo, Emma J Petrie, Paul R Gooley, Ross A D Bathgate

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Expression of Insl3 Protein in AdultInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Diverse functions of insulin-like 3 peptide.The Journal of endocrinology · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Shoni BruellDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ashish SethiDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nicholas SmithFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Daniel J ScottDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mohammed Akhter HossainFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Qing-Ping WuInstitute of Protein Research, College of Life Sciences, and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Zhan-Yun GuoInstitute of Protein Research, College of Life Sciences, and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Emma J PetrieDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Paul R GooleyDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. prg@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0323-449X
Ross A D BathgateDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. bathgate@florey.edu.au.
The University of Melbourne · AUTongji University · CNBiotechnology Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relaxin family peptide receptor 2 (RXFP2) is a GPCR known for its role in reproductive function. It is structurally related to the human relaxin receptor RXFP1 and can be activated by human gene-2 (H2) relaxin as well as its cognate ligand insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3). Both receptors possess an N-terminal low-density lipoprotein type a (LDLa) module that is necessary for activation and is joined to a leucine-rich repeat domain by a linker. This linker has been shown to be important for H2 relaxin binding and activation of RXFP1 and herein we investigate the role of the equivalent region of RXFP2. We demonstrate that the linker's highly-conserved N-terminal region is essential for activation of RXFP2 in response to both ligands. In contrast, the linker is necessary for H2 relaxin, but not INSL3, binding. Our results highlight the distinct mechanism by which INSL3 activates RXFP2 whereby ligand binding mediates reorientation of the LDLa module by the linker region to activate the RXFP2 transmembrane domains in conjunction with the INSL3 A-chain. In contrast, relaxin activation of RXFP2 involves a more RXFP1-like mechanism involving binding to the LDLa-linker, reorientation of the LDLa module and activation of the transmembrane domains by the LDLa alone.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceEuropiumHEK293 CellsHumansInsulinMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMutant ProteinsProtein BindingProtein DomainsProtein Interaction MappingProteinsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, PeptideRelaxinEuropiumInsulinLeydig insulin-like proteinMutant ProteinsProteinsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledReceptors, PeptideRelaxinrelaxin receptors

Identifiers

PMID28607406
PMCPMC5468325
OpenAlexW2623237019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.