Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28607403›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Quantification of within-sample genetic heterogeneity from SNP-array data.

Pierre Martinez, Christopher Kimberley, Nicolai J BirkBak, Andrea Marquard, Zoltan Szallasi, Trevor A Graham

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pierre MartinezUniversité de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM 1052, CNRS 5286, Centre Léon Bérard, Cancer Research Center of Lyon, Lyon, France. pierre.martinez@lyon.unicancer.fr.
Christopher KimberleyEvolution and Cancer laboratory, Centre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, EC1M 6BQ, London, UK.
Nicolai J BirkBakCentre for Biological Sequence Analysis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Andrea MarquardCentre for Biological Sequence Analysis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2928-6017
Zoltan SzallasiCentre for Biological Sequence Analysis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Trevor A GrahamEvolution and Cancer laboratory, Centre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, EC1M 6BQ, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9582-1597

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity (ITH) fosters drug resistance and is a critical hurdle to clinical treatment. ITH can be well-measured using multi-region sampling but this is costly and challenging to implement. There is therefore a need for tools to estimate ITH in individual samples, using standard genomic data such as SNP-arrays, that could be implemented routinely. We designed two novel scores S and R, respectively based on the Shannon diversity index and Ripley's L statistic of spatial homogeneity, to quantify ITH in single SNP-array samples. We created in-silico and in-vitro mixtures of tumour clones, in which diversity was known for benchmarking purposes. We found significant but highly-variable associations of our scores with diversity in-silico (p < 0.001) and moderate associations in-vitro (p = 0.015 and p = 0.085). Our scores were also correlated to previous ITH estimates from sequencing data but heterogeneity in the fraction of tumour cells present across samples hampered accurate quantification. The prognostic potential of both scores was moderate but significantly predictive of survival in several tumour types (corrected p = 0.03). Our work thus shows how individual SNP-arrays reveal intra-sample clonal diversity with moderate accuracy.

Indexed as

Genetic HeterogeneityCell Line, TumorComputer SimulationHumansNeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID28607403
PMCPMC5468233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.