Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28607070›Full record

Trial reportProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Network dynamics of social influence in the wisdom of crowds.

Joshua Becker, Devon Brackbill, Damon Centola

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. COVID-19-related misinformation on social media: a systematic review.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Crowd wisdom enhanced by costly signaling in a virtual rating system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Trial
  3. How intermittent breaks in interaction improve collective intelligence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Free information disrupts even Bayesian crowds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Individual incentives that promote collective intelligence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mixing individual and collective behaviors to predict out-of-routine mobility.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. AI-enhanced collective intelligence.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  19. A new sociology of humans and machines.Nature human behaviour · 2024
    Review
  20. Review

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joshua BeckerAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0000-0002-3054-2447
Devon BrackbillAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Damon CentolaAnnenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; dcentola@asc.upenn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A longstanding problem in the social, biological, and computational sciences is to determine how groups of distributed individuals can form intelligent collective judgments. Since Galton's discovery of the "wisdom of crowds" [Galton F (1907)

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalSocial BehaviorSocial SupportAdultEmotional IntelligenceFemaleHumansMalecollective intelligenceexperimental social sciencesocial learningsocial networkswisdom of crowds

Identifiers

PMID28607070
PMCPMC5495222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.