Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28607064›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2017

Impact of nutrition on social decision making.

Sabrina Strang, Christina Hoeber, Olaf Uhl, Berthold Koletzko, Thomas F Münte, Hendrik Lehnert, Raymond J Dolan, Sebastian M Schmid, Soyoung Q Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. How we decide what to eat: Toward an interdisciplinary model of gut-brain interactions.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sex differences in dispersal syndrome are modulated by environment and evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  15. Reply to Raison and Raichlen: Why does nutrition impact social decision making?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  16. An evolutionary perspective on nutrition and social decision making.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sabrina StrangDepartment of Psychology I, University of Lübeck, 23562 Luebeck, Germany.
Christina HoeberDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University of Lübeck, 23562 Luebeck, Germany.
Olaf UhlDr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University of Munich Medical Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.
Berthold KoletzkoDr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University of Munich Medical Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, 80337 Munich, Germany.
Thomas F MünteDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, 23538 Luebeck, Germany.
Hendrik LehnertDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University of Lübeck, 23562 Luebeck, Germany.
Raymond J DolanWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, WC1N 3BG London, United Kingdom.
Sebastian M SchmidDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University of Lübeck, 23562 Luebeck, Germany.
Soyoung Q ParkDepartment of Psychology I, University of Lübeck, 23562 Luebeck, Germany; soyoung.q.park@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food intake is essential for maintaining homeostasis, which is necessary for survival in all species. However, food intake also impacts multiple biochemical processes that influence our behavior. Here, we investigate the causal relationship between macronutrient composition, its bodily biochemical impact, and a modulation of human social decision making. Across two studies, we show that breakfasts with different macronutrient compositions modulated human social behavior. Breakfasts with a high-carbohydrate/protein ratio increased social punishment behavior in response to norm violations compared with that in response to a low carbohydrate/protein meal. We show that these macronutrient-induced behavioral changes in social decision making are causally related to a lowering of plasma tyrosine levels. The findings indicate that, in a limited sense, "we are what we eat" and provide a perspective on a nutrition-driven modulation of cognition. The findings have implications for education, economics, and public policy, and emphasize that the importance of a balanced diet may extend beyond the mere physical benefits of adequate nutrition.

Indexed as

AdultDecision MakingDietary CarbohydratesDietary FatsEatingEnergy IntakeFemaleHumansMaleNutritional StatusPunishmentSocial BehaviorYoung AdultDietary CarbohydratesDietary Fatsdecision makingnutritionsocial decisiontyrosineultimatum game

Identifiers

PMID28607064
PMCPMC5488927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.