Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28606865›Full record

ReviewMolecular and cellular endocrinology2018

Use of growth hormone, IGF-I, and insulin for anabolic purpose: Pharmacological basis, methods of detection, and adverse effects.

Lindsey J Anderson, Jamie M Tamayose, Jose M Garcia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular and cellular endocrinology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Use of androgens at different stages of life: reproductive period.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lindsey J AndersonGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jamie M TamayoseGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States.
Jose M GarciaGeriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, United States; Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology & Geriatric Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: jose.garcia@va.gov.

Funding

Vector and Transgenic Mouse CoreP30DK017047 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Karin E Bornfeldt · 1986 to 2026
$41.4M
PILOT STUDY--CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCHP30DK035816 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Ellen A Schur · 1986 to 2026
$30.4M
The role of ghrelin and the ghrelin receptor GHSR1a in sarcopenia of agingR03AG040583 · NIA · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GARCIA, JOSE M. · 2011 to 2012
$157k
The Role of Ghrelin and the GHSR-1a receptor in Sarcopenic ObesityI01BX002807 · VA · VA PUGET SOUND HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI GARCIA, JOSE M. · 2016 to 2025
–
The Role of Ghrelin in Cancer CachexiaI01CX000174 · VA · MICHAEL E DEBAKEY VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI GARCIA, JOSE M. · 2009 to 2014
–
BLRD VA I01 BX002807CSRD VA I01 CX000174NIA NIH HHS R03 AG040583NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK017047NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK035816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hormones with anabolic properties such as growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-I), and insulin are commonly abused among professional and recreational athletes to enhance physical ability. Performance enhancing drugs (PEDs) such as these are also commonly used by recreational athletes to improve body aesthetics. The perception of increased muscle mass due to supraphysiologic hormone supplementation, or doping, is widespread among PED users despite a paucity of evidence-based data in humans. Even still, athletes will continue to abuse PEDs in hopes of replicating anecdotal results. It is important to educate the general public and potential treating physicians of the risks of PED use, including the dangers of polypharmacy and substance dependence. It will also be important for the research community to address the common challenges associated with studying PED use such as the ethical considerations of PED administration, the general reticence of the PED-using community to volunteer information, and the constant need to improve or create new detection methods as athletes continually attempt to circumvent current methods. This review highlights the anabolic mechanisms and suggestive data implicating GH, IGF-I, and insulin for use as PEDs, the specific detection methods with cutoff ranges that may be utilized to diagnose abuse of each substance, and their respective side effects.

Indexed as

Anabolic AgentsGrowth HormoneHumansInsulinInsulin-Like Growth Factor IPerformance-Enhancing SubstancesAnabolic AgentsGrowth HormoneInsulinInsulin-Like Growth Factor IPerformance-Enhancing SubstancesDopingDrug abuseMusclePerformance enhancing drugsSide effectsSports

Identifiers

PMID28606865
PMCPMC5723243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.