ArticleBMC public health2017
Exploring shared risks through public-private partnerships in public health programs: a mixed method.
Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustaining health systems in sub-Saharan Africa: public-private partnerships in a new era of reduced donor funding.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
- Challenges and opportunities in financing urban primary healthcare in Iran: pathways to universal health coverage.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Benefits, challenges, and best practices of collaborative partnerships among health supply chain stakeholders in Rwanda: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Transforming healthcare: Saudi Arabia's vision 2030 healthcare model.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2025Article
- Key aspects of the Saudi healthcare system reform and the potential impact on the main stakeholders: A qualitative study.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2024Article
- Regulation and participation of the private sector in the pursuit of universal health coverage: Challenges and strategies for health systems.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- Facilitators of improving the function of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in Iran's health system.Journal of education and health promotion · 2023Article
- Factors affecting compliance with national accreditation essential safety standards in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Role of nongovernmental organizations in Iran's health system: What do they do and what can they do?Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Article
- The Shared Experience of Insured and Uninsured Patients: A Comparative Study.Journal of environmental and public health · 2022Article
- Healthcare Transformation in Saudi Arabia: An Overview Since the Launch of Vision 2030.Health services insights · 2022Article
- Building learning organizational culture during COVID-19 outbreak: a national study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Identifying Healthcare Professional Roles in Developing Palliative Care: A Mixed Method.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Health Policy Development During COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia: Mixed Methods Analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
- Collaboration between the government and nongovernmental organizations in providing health-care services: A systematic review of challenges.Journal of education and health promotion · 2021Review
- An Analysis of Public-Private Partnerships and Sustainable Health Care Provision in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.Health services insights · 2019Review
- Cupping therapy in Saudi Arabia: from control to integration.Integrative medicine research · 2018Review
- Cross-Sector Partnerships for Systemic Change: Systematized Literature Review and Agenda for Further Research.Journal of business ethics : JBE · 2018Review
- Fraud and Abuse in the Saudi Healthcare System: A Triangulation Analysis.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe natural assimilation of the process through which health partners sustain long-term relationships is a key issue in maintaining social well-being, reducing health risk factors, and sustaining public health programs. One global initiative in building effective healthcare systems is public-private partnerships (PPPs). This study elucidates the proposed key performance indicators initiated by the Ministry of Health of Saudi Arabia based on the projections of the government, known as Vision 2030, from the perspective of health risk factors.
methodsThrough an inductive content analysis, this study assessed primary and secondary data in relation to the Saudi National Transformation Program (NTP). To identify the institutions that played a role in formulating the new Saudi Healthcare System, health policies, regulations, and reports published between 1996 and 2016 were categorized. After ranking the risk factors, the investigator selected 13 healthcare professionals in four focus group interviews to insightfully explore the challenges that the NTP faces from a health risk perspective. Thus, the study employed qualitative data gathered through focus group interviews with key figures as well as data extracted from written sources to identify distinct but interrelated partnerships practiced within risk management.
resultsA methodological overview of NTP priority and implementation offered practical guidance in the healthcare context. The five critical factors in maintaining successful and sustainable PPPs were (1) trustworthiness, (2) technological capability, (3) patient-centeredness, (4) competence, and (5) flexibility. Concession on primary and secondary healthcare services might be a good option based on the literature review and considering its popularity in other countries. A high outcome-based risk of PPPs was found as the most commonly shared perspective in risk management.
conclusionsAlthough the impact of the NTP rise has yet to be explored, its potential for challenging health consequences requires consideration and substantial regulatory action. This study contributes to the emerging critical analysis on local health initiatives by highlighting how integration may only be possible with a more radical conceptualization of national health governance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.