Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28606106›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2017

Perceptions of measles, pneumonia, and meningitis vaccines among caregivers in Shanghai, China, and the health belief model: a cross-sectional study.

Abram L Wagner, Matthew L Boulton, Xiaodong Sun, Bhramar Mukherjee, Zhuoying Huang, Irene A Harmsen, Jia Ren, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Abram L WagnerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. awag@umich.edu.
Matthew L BoultonDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Xiaodong SunDepartment of Immunization Programs, Shanghai Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1380 Zhongshan West Road, Shanghai, 200336, China.
Bhramar MukherjeeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Zhuoying HuangDepartment of Immunization Programs, Shanghai Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1380 Zhongshan West Road, Shanghai, 200336, China.
Irene A HarmsenDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jia RenDepartment of Immunization Programs, Shanghai Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1380 Zhongshan West Road, Shanghai, 200336, China.
Brian J Zikmund-FisherDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USShanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention · CNGGD Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn China, the measles vaccine is offered for free whereas the pneumococcal vaccine is a for-fee vaccine. This difference has the potential to influence how caregivers evaluate whether a vaccine is important or necessary for their child, but it is unclear if models of health behavior, such as the Health Belief Model, reveal the same associations for different diseases. This study compares caregiver perceptions of different diseases (measles, pneumonia and meningitis); and characterizes associations between Health Belief Model constructs and both pneumococcal vaccine uptake and perceived vaccine necessity for pneumonia, measles, and meningitis.

methodsCaregivers of infants and young children between 8 months and 7 years of age from Shanghai (n = 619) completed a written survey on their perceptions of measles, pneumonia, and meningitis. We used logistic regression models to assess predictors of pneumococcal vaccine uptake and vaccine necessity.

resultsOnly 25.2% of children had received a pneumococcal vaccine, although most caregivers believed that pneumonia (80.8%) and meningitis (92.4%), as well as measles (93.2%), vaccines were serious enough to warrant a vaccine. Perceived safety was strongly associated with both pneumococcal vaccine uptake and perceived vaccine necessity, and non-locals had 1.70 times higher odds of pneumonia vaccine necessity than non-locals (95% CI: 1.01, 2.88).

conclusionsMost factors had a similar relationship with vaccine necessity, regardless of disease, indicating a common mechanism for how Chinese caregivers decided which vaccines are necessary. Because more caregivers believed meningitis needed a vaccine than pneumonia, health care workers should emphasize pneumococcal vaccination's ability to protect against meningitis.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthMeasles VaccinePneumococcal VaccinesAdultCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansInfantLogistic ModelsMaleMeaslesMeasles VaccinePneumococcal VaccinesChinaHealth belief modelImmunization coverageMeaslesPneumococcus

Identifiers

PMID28606106
PMCPMC5468991
OpenAlexW2622047198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.