Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28606067›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2017

Through the client's eyes: using narratives to explore experiences of care transfers during pregnancy, childbirth, and the neonatal period.

Cherelle M V van Stenus, Mark Gotink, Magda M Boere-Boonekamp, Anneke Sools, Ariana Need

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cherelle M V van StenusInstitute for Innovation and Governance Studies, Departments of Public Administration, and Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands. c.m.v.vanstenus@utwente.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3523-6609
Mark GotinkDepartment of Youth Healthcare, GGD Twente, P.O. Box 1400, 7500 BK, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Magda M Boere-BoonekampInstitute for Innovation and Governance Studies, Department of Health Technology and Services Research, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Anneke SoolsInstitute for Innovation and Governance Studies. Department of Psychology, Health and Technology, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Ariana NeedInstitute for Innovation and Governance Studies, Department of Public Administration, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
University of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe client experience is an important outcome in the evaluation and development of perinatal healthcare. But because clients meet different professionals, measuring such experiences poses a challenge. This is especially the case in the Netherlands, where pregnant women are often transferred between professionals due to the nation's approach to risk selection. This paper explores questions around how clients experience transfers of care during pregnancy, childbirth, and the neonatal period, as well as how these experiences compare to the established quality of care aspects the Dutch Patient Federation developed.

methodNarratives from 17 Dutch women who had given birth about their experiences with transfers were collected in the Netherlands. The narratives, for which informed consent was obtained, were collected on paper and online. Storyline analysis was used to identify story types. Story types portray patterns that indicate how clients experience transfers between healthcare providers. A comparative analysis was performed to identify differences and similarities between existing quality criteria and those clients mentioned.

resultsFour story types were identified: 1) Disconnected transfers of care lead to uncertainties; 2) Seamless transfers of care due to proper collaboration lead to positive experiences; 3) Transfers of care lead to disruption of patient-provider connectedness; 4) Transfer of care is initiated by the client to make pregnancy and childbirth dreams come true. Most of the quality aspects derived from these story types were identified as being similar or complementary to the Dutch Patient Federation list. A 'new' aspect identified in the clients' stories was the influencing role of prior experiences with transfers of care on current expectations, fears, and wishes.

conclusionsTransfers of care affect clients greatly and influence their experiences. Good communication, seamless transfers, and maintaining autonomy contribute to more positive experiences. The stories also show that previous experiences influence client's expectations for the next pregnancy, childbirth, and transfers of care.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceCommunicationContinuity of Patient CareDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansNarrationNetherlandsParturitionPatient TransferPerinatal CarePersonal AutonomyPregnancyPrenatal CareClient experiencesNarrativesPerinatal healthcarePregnancyQuality aspectsTransfers of care

Identifiers

PMID28606067
PMCPMC5467260
OpenAlexW2624871693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.