Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28606015›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2017

Retrospective analysis of premedication, glucocorticosteroids, and H

Kiwako Ikegawa, Shinya Suzuki, Hisanaga Nomura, Tomohiro Enokida, Tomoko Yamazaki, Susumu Okano, Kazushi Endo, Shinichiro Saito, Masakazu Yamaguchi, Makoto Tahara

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kiwako Ikegawa1 Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, National Research and Development Agency, Kashiwa, Japan.
Shinya Suzuki1 Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, National Research and Development Agency, Kashiwa, Japan.
Hisanaga Nomura1 Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, National Research and Development Agency, Kashiwa, Japan.
Tomohiro Enokida2 Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Research and Development Agency, Kashiwa, Japan.
Tomoko Yamazaki2 Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Research and Development Agency, Kashiwa, Japan.
Susumu Okano2 Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Research and Development Agency, Kashiwa, Japan.
Kazushi Endo3 The Japanese Society of Hospital Pharmacists, Shibuya, Japan.
Shinichiro Saito1 Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, National Research and Development Agency, Kashiwa, Japan.
Masakazu Yamaguchi1 Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, National Research and Development Agency, Kashiwa, Japan.
Makoto Tahara2 Department of Head and Neck Medical Oncology, National Research and Development Agency, Kashiwa, Japan.
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JPMeiji Pharmaceutical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives We evaluated infusion-related reactions associated with cetuximab combination chemotherapy comprising an H1-receptor antagonist plus dexamethasone as anti-allergy premedications for patients with head and neck cancer. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 248 patients who received a cetuximab combination regimen between December 2012 and August 2015. All patients received 5 mg intravenous dichlorpheniramine (H1-receptor antagonist), and dexamethasone (DEX) was adjusted from 6.6 mg to 13.2 mg according to the emetogenic risk. Results We identified 248 subjects, including 13 (5.2%) with infusion-related reactions (grade 1 in five [2.0%], grade 2 in seven [2.8%], and grade 4 in one [0.4%]). The incidence of these reactions in cetuximab combination regimens, each employing an H1-receptor antagonist, using a higher dose of dexamethasone (13.2 mg) was not significantly lower compared with those using 6.6 mg DEX (2.4% vs 8.3%, respectively; p = 0.43). Twelve patients experienced infusion-related reactions associated with the first cetuximab administration, and one reaction occurred after the third administration. Conclusions The incidence of infusion-related reactions was lower compared with those of previous studies. Dexamethasone combined with an H1-receptor antagonist was useful for preventing allergic responses. The incidence of infusion-related reactions was not lower with 13.2 mg dexamethasone, and 6.6 mg DEX prevented infusion-related reactions.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCetuximabChlorpheniramineDexamethasoneFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHistamine H1 AntagonistsHumansHypersensitivityIncidenceInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedPremedicationAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCetuximabChlorpheniramineDexamethasonedexchlorpheniramineHistamine H1 AntagonistsCetuximabhead and neck cancerinfusion reactionsmonoclonal antibodiesprophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID28606015
PMCPMC5625540
OpenAlexW2626686372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.