ArticleGenome biology and evolution2017
The Genomic Impact of Gene Retrocopies: What Have We Learned from Comparative Genomics, Population Genomics, and Transcriptomic Analyses?
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Vertebrate Genomes Project Phase I: A global reference genome resource.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Queue Gaps Among the IQGAPs inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- STREMI: a dual-function upstream ORF-encoded regulator of mitochondrial cristae architecture.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- Novel insights into retrogene evolution and cold adaptation in the alpine plant Crucihimalaya himalaica (Brassicaceae).BMC biology · 2026Article
- Retrotransposition Events Shape the Evolution of the Ataxin-3 Gene Family in Primates.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Gene retroposition and functional diversification of retrocopies in the Rhus gall aphid Schlechtendalia chinensis.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Plant long noncoding RNAs: why do we not know more?Biological research · 2025Review
- Multiple Retrotransposon-mediated NF-YA Gene Duplication Events Recurred in Diverse Groups of Mammals at Different Ancestry Levels.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Unveiling the functional nature of retrogenes in dinoflagellates.Open biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Functional innovation through new genes as a general evolutionary process.Nature genetics · 2025Review
- Genomic exploration of retrocopies in Insect pests of plants and their role in the expansion of heat shock proteins superfamily as evolutionary targets.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- RCPedia: a global resource for studying and exploring retrocopies in diverse species.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Duplications and Retrogenes Are Numerous and Widespread in Modern Canine Genomic Assemblies.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- The roles of gene duplications in the dynamics of evolutionary conflicts.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Review
- Mosquitoes Possess Specialized Cuticular Proteins That Are Evolutionarily Related to the Elastic Protein Resilin.Insects · 2023Article
- Functional implications of paralog genes in polyglutamine spinocerebellar ataxias.Human genetics · 2023Review
- Interchromosomal Colocalization with Parental Genes Is Linked to the Function and Evolution of Mammalian Retrocopies.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Article
- Emergence and influence of sequence bias in evolutionarily malleable, mammalian tandem arrays.BMC biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene duplication is a major driver of organismal evolution. Gene retroposition is a mechanism of gene duplication whereby a gene's transcript is used as a template to generate retroposed gene copies, or retrocopies. Intriguingly, the formation of retrocopies depends upon the enzymatic machinery encoded by retrotransposable elements, genomic parasites occurring in the majority of eukaryotes. Most retrocopies are depleted of the regulatory regions found upstream of their parental genes; therefore, they were initially considered transcriptionally incompetent gene copies, or retropseudogenes. However, examples of functional retrocopies, or retrogenes, have accumulated since the 1980s. Here, we review what we have learned about retrocopies in animals, plants and other eukaryotic organisms, with a particular emphasis on comparative and population genomic analyses complemented with transcriptomic datasets. In addition, these data have provided information about the dynamics of the different "life cycle" stages of retrocopies (i.e., polymorphic retrocopy number variants, fixed retropseudogenes and retrogenes) and have provided key insights into the retroduplication mechanisms, the patterns and evolutionary forces at work during the fixation process and the biological function of retrogenes. Functional genomic and transcriptomic data have also revealed that many retropseudogenes are transcriptionally active and a biological role has been experimentally determined for many. Finally, we have learned that not only non-long terminal repeat retroelements but also long terminal repeat retroelements play a role in the emergence of retrocopies across eukaryotes. This body of work has shown that mRNA-mediated duplication represents a widespread phenomenon that produces an array of new genes that contribute to organismal diversity and adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.