Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28605514›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2017

Flipping states: a few key residues decide the winning conformation of the only universally conserved transcription factor.

Da Shi, Dmitri Svetlov, Ruben Abagyan, Irina Artsimovitch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Metamorphic proteins and how to find them.Current opinion in structural biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fluid protein fold space and its implications.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Da ShiDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Dmitri SvetlovDepartment of Chemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Ruben AbagyanSkaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA.
Irina ArtsimovitchThe Center for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
The Ohio State University · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Mechnanism of transcript elongation control by RfaHR01GM067153 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI IRINA ARTSIMOVITCH · 2003 to 2026
$8.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription factors from the NusG family bind to the elongating RNA polymerase to enable synthesis of long RNAs in all domains of life. In bacteria, NusG frequently co-exists with specialized paralogs that regulate expression of a small set of targets, many of which encode virulence factors. Escherichia coli RfaH is the exemplar of this regulatory mechanism. In contrast to NusG, which freely binds to RNA polymerase, RfaH exists in a structurally distinct autoinhibitory state in which the RNA polymerase-binding site is buried at the interface between two RfaH domains. Binding to an ops DNA sequence triggers structural transformation wherein the domains dissociate and RfaH refolds into a NusG-like structure. Formation of the autoinhibitory state, and thus sequence-specific recruitment, represents the decisive step in the evolutionary history of the RfaH subfamily. We used computational and experimental approaches to identify the residues that confer the unique regulatory properties of RfaH. Our analysis highlighted highly conserved Ile and Phe residues at the RfaH interdomain interface. Replacement of these residues with equally conserved Glu and Val counterpart residues in NusG destabilized interactions between the RfaH domains and allowed sequence-independent recruitment to RNA polymerase, suggesting a plausible pathway for diversification of NusG paralogs.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialAmino Acid SequenceAmino Acid SubstitutionBinding SitesDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsEvolution, MolecularGlutamic AcidIsoleucineModels, MolecularPeptide Elongation FactorsPhenylalanineProtein BindingProtein FoldingDNA, BacterialDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEscherichia coli ProteinsGlutamic AcidIsoleucineNusG protein, E coliPeptide Elongation FactorsPhenylalanineRfaH protein, E coliTrans-ActivatorsTranscription FactorsValine

Identifiers

PMID28605514
PMCPMC5587751
OpenAlexW2624106975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.