Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28605501›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

EpiCompare: an online tool to define and explore genomic regions with tissue or cell type-specific epigenomic features.

Yu He, Ting Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. UALCAN Mobile, an app for cancer proteogenomic data analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Robust chromatin state annotation.Genome research · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yu HeDepartment of Genetics, The Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences & Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.
Ting WangDepartment of Genetics, The Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences & Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, USA.

Funding

THE WASHU TARGET ENVIRONMENTAL EPIGENOMICS DATA COORDINATION CENTERU24ES026699 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TING · 2016 to 2021
$5.2M
RESEARCH EDUCATION PROGRAM ON COMPUTATIONAL AND STATISTICAL TOOL DEVELOPMENT FOR ADDICTION GENETICSR25DA027995 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MADDEN, PAMELA ANN, RICE, JOHN P. · 2009 to 2019
$4.3M
DECODING THE IMPACT OF TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS ON GENE REGULATIONR01HG007175 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TING · 2014 to 2021
$2.7M
Connecting transposable elements and regulatory innovation using ENCODE dataU01HG009391 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, BARAK A, FESCHOTTE, CEDRIC · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
The WashU 4DN Network Data Coordination and Integration CenterU01CA200060 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TING · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
ADVANCED EPI/GENOME BROWSER WITH ENHANCED VISUALIZATION AND ANALYSIS TOOLSR01HG007354 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TING · 2013 to 2016
$1.5M
CHARTING THE EPIGENOMIC LANDSCAPE OF HUMAN TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTSR01ES024992 · NIEHS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, TING · 2014 to 2015
$342k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA200060NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007175NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007354NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG009391NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA027995NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES024992NIEHS NIH HHS U24 ES026699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe Human Reference Epigenome Map, generated by the Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium, contains thousands of genome-wide epigenomic datasets that describe epigenomes of a variety of different human tissue and cell types. This map has allowed investigators to obtain a much deeper and more comprehensive view of our regulatory genome, e.g. defining regulatory elements including all promoters and enhancers for a given tissue or cell type. An outstanding task is to combine and compare different epigenomes in order to identify regions with epigenomic features specific to certain types of tissues or cells, e.g. lineage-specific regulatory elements. Currently available tools do not directly address this question. This need motivated us to develop a tool that allows investigators to easily identify regions with epigenetic features unique to specific epigenomes that they choose, making detection of common regulatory elements and/or cell type-specific regulatory elements an interactive and dynamic experience.

resultsAn online tool EpiCompare was developed to assist investigators in exploring the specificity of epigenomic features across selected tissue and cell types. Investigators can design their test by choosing different combinations of epigenomes, and choosing different classification algorithms provided by our tool. EpiCompare will then identify regions with specified epigenomic features, and provide a quality assessment of the predictions. Investigators can interact with EpiCompare by investigating Roadmap Epigenomics data, or uploading their own data for comparison. We demonstrate that by using specific combinations of epigenomes we can detect developmental lineage-specific enhancers. Finally, prediction results can be readily visualized and further explored in the WashU Epigenome Browser. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: EpiCompare is freely available on the web at http://epigenome.wustl.edu/EpiCompare/. CONTACT: twang@genetics.wustl.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSoftwareAlgorithmsEnhancer Elements, GeneticEpigenomicsHumansPromoter Regions, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID28605501
PMCPMC5860030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.