ArticleNucleic acids research2017
Prioritizing tests of epistasis through hierarchical representation of genomic redundancies.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- A prototype-augmented graph representation learning framework for identifying brain disorder-associated genes and facilitating drug repurposing.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Network medicine-based epistasis detection in complex diseases: ready for quantum computing.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Network medicine-based epistasis detection in complex diseases: ready for quantum computing.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Genome-wide case-only analysis of gene-gene interactions with known Parkinson's disease risk variants reveals link between LRRK2 and SYT10.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2023Article
- Genotype imputation in case-only studies of gene-environment interaction: validity and power.Human genetics · 2021Article
- A Low Resolution Epistasis Mapping Approach To Identify Chromosome Arm Interactions in Allohexaploid Wheat.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Epistasis is defined as a statistical interaction between two or more genomic loci in terms of their association with a phenotype of interest. Epistatic loci that are identified using data from Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) provide insights into the interplay among multiple genetic factors, with applications including assessment of susceptibility to complex diseases, decision making in precision medicine, and gaining insights into disease mechanisms. Since the number of genomic loci assayed by GWAS is extremely large (usually in the order of millions), identification of epistatic loci is a statistically difficult and computationally intensive problem. Even when only pairwise interactions are considered, the size of the search space ranges from hundreds of millions to billions of locus pairs. The large number of statistical tests performed also makes sufficient type one error correction imperative. Consequently, efficient algorithms are required to filter the tests that are performed and evaluate large GWAS data sets in a reasonable amount of computation time. It has been observed that many pairwise tests are redundant due to correlations in their genotype values across samples, known as linkage disequilibrium. However, algorithms that have been developed for efficient identification of epistatic loci do not systematically exploit linkage disequilibrium. Here, we propose a new algorithm for fast epistasis detection based on hierarchical representation of linkage disequilibrium (LinDen). We utilize redundancies in genotype patterns between neighboring loci to generate a hierarchical structure and execute a branch-and-bound search to prioritize loci testing based on approximations of a test statistic for pairs of locus groups. The hierarchical organization of tests performed by LinDen allows for efficient scaling based on the screened loci. We test LinDen comprehensively on three data sets obtained from the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium: type two diabetes, psoriasis, and hypertension. Our results show that, as compared other state-of-the-art tools for fast epistasis detection, LinDen drastically reduces the number of tests performed while discovering statistically significant locus pairs. LinDen is implemented in C++ and is available as open source at http://compbio. CASE: edu/linden/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.