Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28605410›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2018

Abstract Representations of Object-Directed Action in the Left Inferior Parietal Lobule.

Quanjing Chen, Frank E Garcea, Robert A Jacobs, Bradford Z Mahon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Object-directed action representations are componentially built in parietal cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Human Neuroimaging Reveals Differences in Activation and Connectivity between Real and Pantomimed Tool Use.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Dorsal Visual Pathway Represents Object-Centered Spatial Relations for Object Recognition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Quanjing ChenDepartment of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627-0268, USA.
Frank E GarceaDepartment of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627-0268, USA.
Robert A JacobsDepartment of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627-0268, USA.
Bradford Z MahonDepartment of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627-0268, USA.
University of Rochester · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Representational Similarity Spaces for Objects and Actions Before and After Brain Tumor SurgeryR01NS089609 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Constantinos George Hadjipanayis, BRADFORD Zack MAHON · 2015 to 2026
$3.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS089609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior neuroimaging and neuropsychological research indicates that the left inferior parietal lobule in the human brain is a critical substrate for representing object manipulation knowledge. In the present functional MRI study we used multivoxel pattern analyses to test whether action similarity among objects can be decoded in the inferior parietal lobule independent of the task applied to objects (identification or pantomime) and stimulus format in which stimuli are presented (pictures or printed words). Participants pantomimed the use of objects, cued by printed words, or identified pictures of objects. Classifiers were trained and tested across task (e.g., training data: pantomime; testing data: identification), stimulus format (e.g., training data: word format; testing format: picture) and specific objects (e.g., training data: scissors vs. corkscrew; testing data: pliers vs. screwdriver). The only brain region in which action relations among objects could be decoded across task, stimulus format and objects was the inferior parietal lobule. By contrast, medial aspects of the ventral surface of the left temporal lobe represented object function, albeit not at the same level of abstractness as actions in the inferior parietal lobule. These results suggest compulsory access to abstract action information in the inferior parietal lobe even when simply identifying objects.

Indexed as

Brain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParietal LobePattern Recognition, VisualPsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28605410
PMCPMC6019004
OpenAlexW2622243750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.