Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28605393›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2017

Drosophila Courtship Conditioning As a Measure of Learning and Memory.

Tom S Koemans, Cornelia Oppitz, Rogier A T Donders, Hans van Bokhoven, Annette Schenck, Krystyna Keleman, Jamie M Kramer

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genes Responsible for HBiomolecules · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Tom S KoemansDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center; Radboud Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University.
Cornelia OppitzResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, Austria.
Rogier A T DondersDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center.
Hans van BokhovenDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University.
Annette SchenckDepartment of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University.
Krystyna KelemanJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Jamie M KramerDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University; Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Western University; jkramer6@uwo.ca.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLJanelia Research Campus · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology · ATUniversity Medical Center · USWestern University · CA

Funding

Resource Component: Acquisition, maintenance and distribution of Drosophila stocksP40OD018537 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Annette L. Parks · 2014 to 2026
$13.5M
NIH HHS P40 OD018537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying learning and memory have been elucidated through the use of simple behavioral assays in model organisms such as the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. Drosophila is useful for understanding the basic neurobiology underlying cognitive deficits resulting from mutations in genes associated with human cognitive disorders, such as intellectual disability (ID) and autism. This work describes a methodology for testing learning and memory using a classic paradigm in Drosophila known as courtship conditioning. Male flies court females using a distinct pattern of easily recognizable behaviors. Premated females are not receptive to mating and will reject the male's copulation attempts. In response to this rejection, male flies reduce their courtship behavior. This learned reduction in courtship behavior is measured over time, serving as an indicator of learning and memory. The basic numerical output of this assay is the courtship index (CI), which is defined as the percentage of time that a male spends courting during a 10 min interval. The learning index (LI) is the relative reduction of CI in flies that have been exposed to a premated female compared to naïve flies with no previous social encounters. For the statistical comparison of LIs between genotypes, a randomization test with bootstrapping is used. To illustrate how the assay can be used to address the role of a gene relating to learning and memory, the pan-neuronal knockdown of Dihydroxyacetone phosphate acyltransferase (Dhap-at) was characterized here. The human ortholog of Dhap-at, glyceronephosphate O-acyltransferase (GNPT), is involved in rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata type 2, an autosomal-recessive syndrome characterized by severe ID. Using the courtship conditioning assay, it was determined that Dhap-at is required for long-term memory, but not for short-term memory. This result serves as a basis for further investigation of the underlying molecular mechanisms.

Indexed as

AnimalsCourtshipDrosophila melanogasterFemaleHumansLearningMaleMemory

Identifiers

PMID28605393
PMCPMC5608251
OpenAlexW2621734809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.