Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28605386›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2017

Simultaneous Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Kathleen A Williams, Yuranny Cabral-Calderin, Carsten Schmidt-Samoa, Christiane Anne Weinrich, Peter Dechent, Melanie Wilke

Open access · bronzeAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Probing the Link Between Perception and Oscillations: Lessons from Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen A WilliamsDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, University Medicine Goettingen; katie.aw@gmail.com.
Yuranny Cabral-CalderinDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, University Medicine Goettingen; German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research.
Carsten Schmidt-SamoaDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, University Medicine Goettingen.
Christiane Anne WeinrichDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, University Medicine Goettingen; Department of Neurology, University Medicine Goettingen.
Peter DechentDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, University Medicine Goettingen.
Melanie WilkeDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, University Medicine Goettingen; German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research; DFG Center for Nanoscale Microscopy & Molecular Physiology of the Brain (CNMPB).
German Primate Center · DENanoscale Microscopy and Molecular Physiology of the Brain Cluster of Excellence 171 — DFG Research Center 103 · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a promising tool for noninvasive investigation of brain oscillations. TACS employs frequency-specific stimulation of the human brain through current applied to the scalp with surface electrodes. Most current knowledge of the technique is based on behavioral studies; thus, combining the method with brain imaging holds potential to better understand the mechanisms of tACS. Because of electrical and susceptibility artifacts, combining tACS with brain imaging can be challenging, however, one brain imaging technique that is well suited to be applied simultaneously with tACS is functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In our lab, we have successfully combined tACS with simultaneous fMRI measurements to show that tACS effects are state, current, and frequency dependent, and that modulation of brain activity is not limited to the area directly below the electrodes. This article describes a safe and reliable setup for applying tACS simultaneously with visual task fMRI studies, which can lend to understanding oscillatory brain function as well as the effects of tACS on the brain.

Indexed as

BrainElectroencephalographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID28605386
PMCPMC5527955
OpenAlexW2622119037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.