Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28605043›Full record

ArticleClinical cardiology2017

Typical angina is associated with greater coronary endothelial dysfunction but not abnormal vasodilatory reserve.

Ahmed AlBadri, Derek Leong, C Noel Bairey Merz, Janet Wei, Eileen M Handberg, Chrisandra L Shufelt, Puja K Mehta, Michael D Nelson, Louise E Thomson, Daniel S Berman and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Angina and coronary microvascular dysfunction: unravelling the links.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ahmed AlBadriBarbra Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0011-0827
Derek LeongBarbra Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.
C Noel Bairey MerzBarbra Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Janet WeiBarbra Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Eileen M HandbergDivision of Cardiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Chrisandra L ShufeltBarbra Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Puja K MehtaProgram in Cardiovascular Outcomes Research and Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Michael D NelsonBarbra Streisand Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Louise E ThomsonS. Mark Taper Foundation Imaging Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Daniel S BermanS. Mark Taper Foundation Imaging Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Leslee J ShawProgram in Cardiovascular Outcomes Research and Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Galen Cook-WiensBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Carl J PepineDivision of Cardiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USEmory University · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

ZONA-FREE HAMSTER OVA ASSAY AS AN INDICATOR OF MALE FERTILITYM01RR000425 · NCRR · LUNDQUIST INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION AT HARBOR-UCLA MEDICAL CENTER · PI WANG, CHRISTINA C. · 1985 to 2011
$74.2M
UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
UCLA CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTEUL1RR033176 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2011 to 2011
$15.5M
Quantitative Prediction of Disease and Outcomes from Next Generation SPECT and CTR01HL089765 · NHLBI · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI SLOMKA, PIOTR J · 2007 to 2021
$6.1M
ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE IN WOMEN--CLINICAL CENTERN01HV068163 · HV · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PEPINE, CARL J · 1996 to 2001
$386k
ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE IN WOMEN-CLINICAL CENTERN01HV068161 · HV · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ROGERS, WILLIAM J · 1996 to 2000
$245k
EVAL OF ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE IN WOMEN-CLINICAL CTRN01HV068164 · HV · ALLEGHENY-SINGER RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI REICHEK, NATHANIEL · 1996 to 2001
–
EVAL OF ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE IN WOMEN-CLINICAL CTR-N01HV68162-268068162N01HV068162 · HV · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · 1996 to 2005
–
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000425NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR033176NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HV068161NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HV068162NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HV068163NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HV068164NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTypical angina (TA) is defined as substernal chest pain precipitated by physical exertion or emotional stress and relieved with rest or nitroglycerin. Women and elderly patients are usually have atypical symptoms both at rest and during stress, often in the setting of nonobstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). HYPOTHESIS: To further understand this, we performed subgroup analysis comparing subjects who presented with TA vs nontypical angina (NTA) using baseline data of patients with nonobstructive CAD and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) enrolled in a clinical trial.

methods155 subjects from the RWISE study were divided into 2 groups based on angina characteristics: TA (defined as above) and NTA (angina that does not meet criteria for TA). Coronary reactivity testing (responses to adenosine, acetylcholine, and nitroglycerin), cardiac magnetic resonance-determined myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI), baseline Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), and Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) scores were evaluated.

resultsThe mean age was 55 ± 10 years; Overall, 30% of subjects had TA. Baseline shortness of breath, invasively assessed acetylcholine-mediated coronary endothelial function, and SAQ score were worse in the TA group (all P < 0.05), whereas adenosine-mediated coronary flow reserve, MPRI, and DASI score were similar to the NTA group.

conclusionsAmong subjects with CMD and no obstructive CAD, those with TA had more angina pectoris, shortness of breath, and worse quality of life, as well as more severe coronary endothelial dysfunction. Typical angina in the setting of CMD is associated with worse symptom burden and coronary endothelial dysfunction. These results indicate that TA CMD subjects represent a relatively new CAD phenotype for future study and treatment trials.

Indexed as

VasodilationAgedAngina PectorisCoronary VesselsDyspneaEndothelium, VascularFemaleFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingPhenotypePredictive Value of TestsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVasodilator AgentsAtypical AnginaCoronary Endothelial DysfunctionCoronary Microvascular DysfunctionQuality of LifeTypical Angina

Identifiers

PMID28605043
PMCPMC5680106
OpenAlexW2625533364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.