Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28604916›Full record

Trial reportJAMA neurology2017

Interpreting Lymphocyte Reconstitution Data From the Pivotal Phase 3 Trials of Alemtuzumab.

David Baker, Samuel S Herrod, Cesar Alvarez-Gonzalez, Gavin Giovannoni, Klaus Schmierer

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 134 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
134citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

134 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 241 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Alemtuzumab and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: Analysis of an international surveillance database and systematic literature review.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rethinking MS Therapeutics: From Disease Pathogenesis Mechanisms to AI-Driven Drug Discovery.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The Present and Future of Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

74 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David BakerCentre for Neuroscience and Trauma, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, England.
Samuel S HerrodCentre for Neuroscience and Trauma, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, England.
Cesar Alvarez-GonzalezCentre for Neuroscience and Trauma, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, England.
Gavin GiovannoniCentre for Neuroscience and Trauma, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, England.
Klaus SchmiererCentre for Neuroscience and Trauma, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, England.
Queen Mary University of London · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBRoyal London Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Alemtuzumab, a CD52-depleting monoclonal antibody, effectively inhibits relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) but is associated with a high incidence of secondary B-cell autoimmunities that limit use. These effects may be avoided through control of B-cell hyperproliferation. Objective: To investigate whether the data describing the effect of alemtuzumab on lymphocyte subsets collected during the phase 3 trial program reveal mechanisms explaining efficacy and the risk for secondary autoimmunity with treatment of MS. Design, Setting, and Participants: Lymphocyte reconstitution data from regulatory submissions of the pivotal Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis I and II (CARE-MS I and II) trials were obtained from the European Medicines Agency via Freedom of Information requests. Data used in this study were reported from June 22 to October 12, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Tabulated data from T- and B-lymphocyte subset analysis and antidrug antibody responses were extracted from the supplied documents. Results: Alemtuzumab depleted CD4+ T cells by more than 95%, including regulatory cells (-80%) and CD8+ T cells (>80% depletion), which remained well below reference levels throughout the trials. However, although CD19+ B cells were initially also depleted (>85%), marked (180% increase) hyperrepopulation of immature B cells occurred with conversion to mature B cells over time. These lymphocyte kinetics were associated with rapid development of alemtuzumab-binding and -neutralizing antibodies and subsequent occurrence of secondary B-cell autoimmunity. Hyperrepopulation of B cells masked a marked, long-term depletion of CD19+ memory B cells that may underpin efficacy in MS. Conclusions and Relevance: Although blockade of memory T and B cells may limit MS, rapid CD19+ B-cell subset repopulation in the absence of effective T-cell regulation has implications for the safety and efficacy of alemtuzumab. Controlling B-cell proliferation until T-cell regulation recovers may limit secondary autoimmunity, which does not occur with other B-cell-depleting agents.

Indexed as

AlemtuzumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntigens, CDAntineoplastic AgentsAutoimmunityB-LymphocytesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKiller Cells, NaturalLymphocyte CountLymphocytesLymphopeniaMaleMultiple SclerosisAlemtuzumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntigens, CDAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID28604916
PMCPMC5710323
OpenAlexW2626464574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.