Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28604818›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2017

CACNA1C gene regulates behavioral strategies in operant rule learning.

Georgia Koppe, Anne Stephanie Mallien, Stefan Berger, Dusan Bartsch, Peter Gass, Barbara Vollmayr, Daniel Durstewitz

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Neuronal deletion of CaScientific reports · 2022
    Article
  3. Dysregulation ofLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Deep neural networks in psychiatry.Molecular psychiatry · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Georgia KoppeDepartment of Theoretical Neuroscience, Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2941-9238
Anne Stephanie MallienClinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Stefan BergerDepartment of Molecular Biology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Dusan BartschDepartment of Molecular Biology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Peter GassClinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Barbara VollmayrClinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Daniel DurstewitzDepartment of Theoretical Neuroscience, Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioral experiments are usually designed to tap into a specific cognitive function, but animals may solve a given task through a variety of different and individual behavioral strategies, some of them not foreseen by the experimenter. Animal learning may therefore be seen more as the process of selecting among, and adapting, potential behavioral policies, rather than mere strengthening of associative links. Calcium influx through high-voltage-gated Ca2+ channels is central to synaptic plasticity, and altered expression of Cav1.2 channels and the CACNA1C gene have been associated with severe learning deficits and psychiatric disorders. Given this, we were interested in how specifically a selective functional ablation of the Cacna1c gene would modulate the learning process. Using a detailed, individual-level analysis of learning on an operant cue discrimination task in terms of behavioral strategies, combined with Bayesian selection among computational models estimated from the empirical data, we show that a Cacna1c knockout does not impair learning in general but has a much more specific effect: the majority of Cacna1c knockout mice still managed to increase reward feedback across trials but did so by adapting an outcome-based strategy, while the majority of matched controls adopted the experimentally intended cue-association rule. Our results thus point to a quite specific role of a single gene in learning and highlight that much more mechanistic insight could be gained by examining response patterns in terms of a larger repertoire of potential behavioral strategies. The results may also have clinical implications for treating psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

Conditioning, OperantDiscrimination LearningExploratory BehaviorModels, PsychologicalAlgorithmsAnimalsBayes TheoremBehavior, AnimalCalcium Channels, L-TypeChoice BehaviorComputational BiologyCuesFeedback, PsychologicalHeuristicsMaleMice, Inbred C57BLCACNA1C protein, mouseCalcium Channels, L-TypeNerve Tissue Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28604818
PMCPMC5467799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.