Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28604791›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

Challenges in developing methods for quantifying the effects of weather and climate on water-associated diseases: A systematic review.

Giovanni Lo Iacono, Ben Armstrong, Lora E Fleming, Richard Elson, Sari Kovats, Sotiris Vardoulakis, Gordon L Nichols

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. How climate change can affect cholera incidence and prevalence? A systematic review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Food and waterborne parasitology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Climate Change Impacts on Microbiota in Beach Sand and Water: Looking Ahead.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Implementation of a national waterborne disease outbreak surveillance system: overview and preliminary results, France, 2010 to 2019.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Heavy Rainfall Events and Diarrheal Diseases: The Role of Urban-Rural Geography.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. New methodologies for the estimation of population vulnerability to diseases: a case study of Lassa fever and Ebola in Nigeria and Sierra Leone.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Giovanni Lo IaconoChemical and Environmental Effects Department, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Chilton, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6150-2843
Ben ArmstrongDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Lora E FlemingEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro, Cornwall, United Kingdom.
Richard ElsonGastrointestinal Infections, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.
Sari KovatsDepartment of Social and Environmental Health Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Sotiris VardoulakisChemical and Environmental Effects Department, Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards, Public Health England, Chilton, United Kingdom.
Gordon L NicholsEuropean Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro, Cornwall, United Kingdom.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBPublic Health England · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K019341/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infectious diseases attributable to unsafe water supply, sanitation and hygiene (e.g. Cholera, Leptospirosis, Giardiasis) remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in low-income countries. Climate and weather factors are known to affect the transmission and distribution of infectious diseases and statistical and mathematical modelling are continuously developing to investigate the impact of weather and climate on water-associated diseases. There have been little critical analyses of the methodological approaches. Our objective is to review and summarize statistical and modelling methods used to investigate the effects of weather and climate on infectious diseases associated with water, in order to identify limitations and knowledge gaps in developing of new methods. We conducted a systematic review of English-language papers published from 2000 to 2015. Search terms included concepts related to water-associated diseases, weather and climate, statistical, epidemiological and modelling methods. We found 102 full text papers that met our criteria and were included in the analysis. The most commonly used methods were grouped in two clusters: process-based models (PBM) and time series and spatial epidemiology (TS-SE). In general, PBM methods were employed when the bio-physical mechanism of the pathogen under study was relatively well known (e.g. Vibrio cholerae); TS-SE tended to be used when the specific environmental mechanisms were unclear (e.g. Campylobacter). Important data and methodological challenges emerged, with implications for surveillance and control of water-associated infections. The most common limitations comprised: non-inclusion of key factors (e.g. biological mechanism, demographic heterogeneity, human behavior), reporting bias, poor data quality, and collinearity in exposures. Furthermore, the methods often did not distinguish among the multiple sources of time-lags (e.g. patient physiology, reporting bias, healthcare access) between environmental drivers/exposures and disease detection. Key areas of future research include: disentangling the complex effects of weather/climate on each exposure-health outcome pathway (e.g. person-to-person vs environment-to-person), and linking weather data to individual cases longitudinally.

Indexed as

ClimateModels, BiologicalWater MicrobiologyWeatherCommunicable Diseases

Identifiers

PMID28604791
PMCPMC5481148
OpenAlexW2624753543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.