Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28604786›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Tinnitus alters resting state functional connectivity (RSFC) in human auditory and non-auditory brain regions as measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

Juan San Juan, Xiao-Su Hu, Mohamad Issa, Silvia Bisconti, Ioulia Kovelman, Paul Kileny, Gregory Basura

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Tinnitus Update.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juan San JuanDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Kresge Hearing Research Inst., The University of Michigan, 1100 W Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5368-8839
Xiao-Su HuCenter for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Mohamad IssaDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Kresge Hearing Research Inst., The University of Michigan, 1100 W Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Silvia BiscontiCenter for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Ioulia KovelmanCenter for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Paul KilenyDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Kresge Hearing Research Inst., The University of Michigan, 1100 W Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Gregory BasuraDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Kresge Hearing Research Inst., The University of Michigan, 1100 W Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
University of Michigan · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tinnitus, or phantom sound perception, leads to increased spontaneous neural firing rates and enhanced synchrony in central auditory circuits in animal models. These putative physiologic correlates of tinnitus to date have not been well translated in the brain of the human tinnitus sufferer. Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) we recently showed that tinnitus in humans leads to maintained hemodynamic activity in auditory and adjacent, non-auditory cortices. Here we used fNIRS technology to investigate changes in resting state functional connectivity between human auditory and non-auditory brain regions in normal-hearing, bilateral subjective tinnitus and controls before and after auditory stimulation. Hemodynamic activity was monitored over the region of interest (primary auditory cortex) and non-region of interest (adjacent non-auditory cortices) and functional brain connectivity was measured during a 60-second baseline/period of silence before and after a passive auditory challenge consisting of alternating pure tones (750 and 8000Hz), broadband noise and silence. Functional connectivity was measured between all channel-pairs. Prior to stimulation, connectivity of the region of interest to the temporal and fronto-temporal region was decreased in tinnitus participants compared to controls. Overall, connectivity in tinnitus was differentially altered as compared to controls following sound stimulation. Enhanced connectivity was seen in both auditory and non-auditory regions in the tinnitus brain, while controls showed a decrease in connectivity following sound stimulation. In tinnitus, the strength of connectivity was increased between auditory cortex and fronto-temporal, fronto-parietal, temporal, occipito-temporal and occipital cortices. Together these data suggest that central auditory and non-auditory brain regions are modified in tinnitus and that resting functional connectivity measured by fNIRS technology may contribute to conscious phantom sound perception and potentially serve as an objective measure of central neural pathology.

Indexed as

Spectroscopy, Near-InfraredAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAlgorithmsAuditory CortexBrainCase-Control StudiesComputer SimulationHumansMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalNeural PathwaysReproducibility of ResultsTinnitusYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28604786
PMCPMC5467838
OpenAlexW2625950646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.