Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28604675›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Identification of the elementary structural units of the DNA damage response.

Francesco Natale, Alexander Rapp, Wei Yu, Andreas Maiser, Hartmann Harz, Annina Scholl, Stephan Grulich, Tobias Anton, David Hörl, Wei Chen and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. DNA damage repair inhibitors boost targeted radionuclide therapy and immunotherapy of prostate cancer.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Lewy body dementia promotion by air pollutants.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Recipes and ingredients for deep learning models of 3D genome folding.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Francesco NataleDepartment of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Alexander RappDepartment of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9108-3929
Wei YuDepartment of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Andreas MaiserDepartment of Biology II, Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM), LMU Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Hartmann HarzDepartment of Biology II, Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM), LMU Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Annina SchollDepartment of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Stephan GrulichDepartment of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.
Tobias AntonDepartment of Biology II, Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM), LMU Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
David HörlDepartment of Biology II, Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM), LMU Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Wei ChenMax Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, 13125 Berlin, Germany.
Marco DuranteDepartment of Biophysics, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany.
Gisela Taucher-ScholzDepartment of Biophysics, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany.
Heinrich LeonhardtDepartment of Biology II, Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich (CIPSM), LMU Munich, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
M Cristina CardosoDepartment of Biology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histone H2AX phosphorylation is an early signalling event triggered by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). To elucidate the elementary units of phospho-H2AX-labelled chromatin, we integrate super-resolution microscopy of phospho-H2AX during DNA repair in human cells with genome-wide sequencing analyses. Here we identify phospho-H2AX chromatin domains in the nanometre range with median length of ∼75 kb. Correlation analysis with over 60 genomic features shows a time-dependent euchromatin-to-heterochromatin repair trend. After X-ray or CRISPR-Cas9-mediated DSBs, phospho-H2AX-labelled heterochromatin exhibits DNA decondensation while retaining heterochromatic histone marks, indicating that chromatin structural and molecular determinants are uncoupled during repair. The phospho-H2AX nano-domains arrange into higher-order clustered structures of discontinuously phosphorylated chromatin, flanked by CTCF. CTCF knockdown impairs spreading of the phosphorylation throughout the 3D-looped nano-domains. Co-staining of phospho-H2AX with phospho-Ku70 and TUNEL reveals that clusters rather than nano-foci represent single DSBs. Hence, each chromatin loop is a nano-focus, whose clusters correspond to previously known phospho-H2AX foci.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairChromatinDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedEpigenesis, GeneticHistonesModels, GeneticPhosphorylationChromatinHistones

Identifiers

PMID28604675
PMCPMC5472794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.