Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28604446›Full record

ReviewTransplantation2017

Evolving Approaches in the Identification of Allograft-Reactive T and B Cells in Mice and Humans.

James S Young, Christine McIntosh, Maria-Luisa Alegre, Anita S Chong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Outstanding questions in transplantation: B cells, alloantibodies, and humoral rejection.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2019
    Review
  6. Heterogeneity of memory B cells.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James S Young1 Section of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. 2 Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Christine McIntosh
Maria-Luisa Alegre
Anita S Chong
University of Chicago · US

Funding

T cell mechanisms that distinguish robust tolerance from metastable allograft acceptance and failed tolerance (Project 2)P01AI097113 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Maria-Luisa Alegre, Anita S Chong · 2012 to 2026
$23.8M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN RESPIRATORY BIOLOGYT32HL007605 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Yun Fang, Gokhan M. Mutlu · 1985 to 2026
$18.1M
Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (NRSA) Institutional Research Training Grant (Parent T32)T32HD007009 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI NANCY B SCHWARTZ · 1985 to 2026
$13.0M
Mechanistic studies on Listeria infection and inhibition of allograft toleranceR01AI072630 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CHONG, ANITA S · 2007 to 2011
$2.1M
Deconstructing the allo-specific memory B cell responseR01AI110513 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI SCIAMMAS, ROGER · 2014 to 2017
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007605NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI097113NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI072630NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI110513NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether a transplanted allograft is stably accepted, rejected, or achieves immunological tolerance is dependent on the frequency and function of alloreactive lymphocytes, making the identification and analysis of alloreactive T and B cells in transplant recipients critical for understanding mechanisms, and the prediction of allograft outcome. In animal models, tracking the fate of graft-reactive T and B cells allows investigators to uncover their biology and develop new therapeutic strategies to protect the graft. In the clinic, identification and quantification of graft-reactive T and B cells allows for the early diagnosis of immune reactivity and therapeutic intervention to prevent graft loss. In addition to rejection, probing of T and B cell fate in vivo provides insights into the underlying mechanisms of alloimmunity or tolerance that may lead to biomarkers predicting graft fate. In this review, we discuss existing and developing approaches to track and analyze alloreactive T and B cells in mice and humans and provide examples of discoveries made utilizing these techniques. These approaches include mixed lymphocyte reactions, trans-vivo delayed-type hypersensitivity, enzyme-linked immunospot assays, the use of antigen receptor transgenic lymphocytes, and utilization of peptide-major histocompatibility multimers, along with imaging techniques for static multiparameter analysis or dynamic in vivo tracking. Such approaches have already refined our understanding of the alloimmune response and are pointing to new ways to improve allograft outcomes in the clinic.

Indexed as

Graft SurvivalImmunologic TechniquesLymphocyte ActivationOrgan TransplantationTransplantation ToleranceAllograftsAnimalsB-LymphocytesGraft RejectionHistocompatibilityHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsIsoantibodiesMiceModels, AnimalPlasma CellsImmunosuppressive AgentsIsoantibodies

Identifiers

PMID28604446
PMCPMC5653459
OpenAlexW2622053246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.