Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28604372›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2017

Adaptive region-growing with maximum curvature strategy for tumor segmentation in

Shan Tan, Laquan Li, Wookjin Choi, Min Kyu Kang, Warren D D'Souza, Wei Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Radiomics: a primer on high-throughput image phenotyping.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Joint Tumor Segmentation in PET-CT Images Using Co-Clustering and Fusion Based on Belief Functions.IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shan TanKey Laboratory of Image Processing and Intelligent Control of Ministry of Education of China, School of Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, People's Republic of China.
Laquan LiKey Laboratory of Image Processing and Intelligent Control of Ministry of Education of China, School of Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, People's Republic of China.
Wookjin ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States of America.
Min Kyu KangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States of America.
Warren D D'SouzaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States of America.
Wei LuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States of America.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Quantitative PET/CT Analysis to Improve Evaluation of Tumor ResponseR01CA172638 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI LU, WEI · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate tumor segmentation in PET is crucial in many oncology applications. We developed an adaptive region-growing (ARG) algorithm with a maximum curvature strategy (ARG_MC) for tumor segmentation in PET. The ARG_MC repeatedly applied a confidence connected region-growing algorithm with increasing relaxing factor f. The optimal relaxing factor (ORF) was then determined at the transition point on the f-volume curve, where the volume just grew from the tumor into the surrounding normal tissues. The ARG_MC along with five widely used algorithms were tested on a phantom with 6 spheres at different signal to background ratios and on two clinic datasets including 20 patients with esophageal cancer and 11 patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The ARG_MC did not require any phantom calibration or any a priori knowledge of the tumor or PET scanner. The identified ORF varied with tumor types (mean ORF  =  9.61, 3.78 and 2.55 respectively for the phantom, esophageal cancer, and NHL datasets), and varied from one tumor to another. For the phantom, the ARG_MC ranked the second in segmentation accuracy with an average Dice similarity index (DSI) of 0.86, only slightly worse than Daisne's adaptive thresholding method (DSI  =  0.87), which required phantom calibration. For both the esophageal cancer dataset and the NHL dataset, the ARG_MC had the highest accuracy with an average DSI of 0.87 and 0.84, respectively. The ARG_MC was robust to parameter settings and region of interest selection, and it did not depend on scanners, imaging protocols, or tumor types. Furthermore, the ARG_MC made no assumption about the tumor size or tumor uptake distribution, making it suitable for segmenting tumors with heterogeneous FDG uptake. In conclusion, the ARG_MC was accurate, robust and easy to use, it provides a highly potential tool for PET tumor segmentation in clinic.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron-Emission TomographyAlgorithmsCalibrationEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLymphoma, Non-HodgkinPhantoms, ImagingFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID28604372
PMCPMC5497763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.