Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28604255›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2017

The effectiveness of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination in the prevention of pediatric hospitalizations for targeted and untargeted infections: A retrospective cohort study.

Giuseppe La Torre, Rosella Saulle, Brigid Unim, Angela Meggiolaro, Angelo Barbato, Alice Mannocci, Antonietta Spadea

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Vaccines for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Vaccines for measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Phylogenetic and Epidemiological Analysis of Measles Viruses in Shenzhen, China from January 2015 to July 2019.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giuseppe La Torrea Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases , "Sapienza" University of Rome , Rome , Italy.
Rosella Saullea Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases , "Sapienza" University of Rome , Rome , Italy.
Brigid Unima Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases , "Sapienza" University of Rome , Rome , Italy.
Angela Meggiolaroa Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases , "Sapienza" University of Rome , Rome , Italy.
Angelo Barbatob RM/1 Local Health Unit , Rome , Italy.
Alice Mannoccia Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases , "Sapienza" University of Rome , Rome , Italy.
Antonietta Spadeab RM/1 Local Health Unit , Rome , Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITAzienda Sanitaria Locale Roma 3 · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine in reducing hospitalizations for infectious disease, targeted and not targeted, as well as from respiratory diseases in children in Rome.

methodsThe cohort was recomposed through record linkage of 2 archives (vaccination register and hospital discharge records.

resultsThe analysis included 11,004 children. 20.9% did not receive the MMR vaccination, 49% and 30.1% received one and 2 doses. There were no hospitalizations for rubella, 2 for mumps, and 12 for measles. The vaccine was highly protective against measles and mumps hospitalizations (HR = 0.10; 95% CI: 0.03.0.34). Regarding all infectious diseases there were 414 hospitalizations, and the vaccine was protective (HR = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.34). Concerning respiratory diseases, there were 809 admissions (7.4%), and the vaccine was highly protective (HR: 0.18; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.48).

conclusionsMMR vaccination is effective for the primary prevention of target and not targeted infectious diseases and may also limit hospitalizations for respiratory diseases.

Indexed as

HospitalizationMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMaleMeaslesMumpsRespiratory Tract InfectionsRetrospective StudiesRomeRubellaVaccinationMeasles-Mumps-Rubella VaccineVaccines, Attenuatedhospital dischargemeaslesmumpsrespiratory diseasesrubellavaccine

Identifiers

PMID28604255
PMCPMC5557224
OpenAlexW2626843588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.