Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28604128›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2017

Cognitive screening tools for primary care settings: examining the 'Test Your Memory' and 'General Practitioner assessment of Cognition' tools in a rural aging population in Greece.

Eliza Iatraki, Panagiotis G Simos, Antonios Bertsias, George Duijker, Ioannis Zaganas, Chariklia Tziraki, Alexandros N Vgontzas, Christos Lionis, THALIS Primary Health Care Research Team/Network

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparing Short Cognitive Screening Instruments in an Outreach Memory Clinic in Primary Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eliza Iatrakia Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine , University of Crete , Heraklion , Greece.
Panagiotis G Simosb Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine , University of Crete , Heraklion , Greece.
Antonios Bertsiasa Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine , University of Crete , Heraklion , Greece.
George Duijkera Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine , University of Crete , Heraklion , Greece.
Ioannis Zaganasc Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine , University of Crete , Heraklion , Greece.
Chariklia Tzirakid MELEBEV Community Elders Clubs , Research Department , Jerusalem , Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2662-6023
Alexandros N Vgontzasb Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine , University of Crete , Heraklion , Greece.
Christos Lionisa Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine , University of Crete , Heraklion , Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9324-2839
THALIS Primary Health Care Research Team/Network
University of Crete · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnder conditions of high demand for primary care services in a setting of low financial resources, there is need for brief, easily administered cognitive screening tools for use in the primary care setting, especially in rural areas. However, interpretation of these cognitive tests' results requires knowledge on their susceptibility to cultural, educational and demographic patient characteristics.

objectivesTo assess the clinical validity of the 'Test Your Memory' (TYM) and 'General Practitioner assessment of Cognition' (GPCog) which was specifically designed for primary care practice, in a rural primary care setting in Greece, utilizing the 'Mini Mental State Examination' (MMSE) as a reference standard.

methodsThe MMSE, TYM, and GPCog were administered to a random sample of 319 community dwelling Greek adults aged 60 to 89 years in 11 rural Primary Healthcare Centres of the Prefecture of Heraklion on the island of Crete, Greece. Analyses examined (a) The association of each instrument with demographic factors and MMSE and (b) optimal cut-off scores, sensitivity and specificity against MMSE-based cognitive impairment risk using ROC analyses with the MMSE 23/24 point cut-off as a reference standard.

resultsWe found a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 77% for TYM (35/36 or 38/39 cut-off, depending on education). Corresponding values were 89% and 61% for GPCog (7/8 cut-off), respectively.

conclusionThe TYM and GPCog instruments appear to be suitable for routine use in the primary care setting as tools for cognitive impairment risk detection in elderly rural populations.

Indexed as

Mental Status and Dementia TestsAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAgingCognitive DysfunctionEducational StatusFemaleGreeceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareROC CurveRural PopulationSex FactorsCognitive screeningprimary care settingrural population

Identifiers

PMID28604128
PMCPMC5774277
OpenAlexW2622763869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.