Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28603766›Full record

ArticleAddictive behaviors reports2016

Evaluating the Relationship between Explicit and Implicit Drinking Identity Centrality and Hazardous Drinking.

Kristen P Lindgren, Jason J Ramirez, Nauder Namaky, Cecilia C Olin, Bethany A Teachman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addictive behaviors reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. I am what I am: A meta-analysis of the association between substance user identities and substance use-related outcomes.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Alcohol consumption, drinker identity, and quality of life among students: why there cannot be one prevention strategy for all.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristen P LindgrenUniversity of Washington, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, 1100 NE 45 St., Ste 300, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Jason J RamirezUniversity of Washington, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, 1100 NE 45 St., Ste 300, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Nauder NamakyUniversity of Virginia, Department of Psychology, PO BOX 400400, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4400, USA.
Cecilia C OlinUniversity of Washington, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, 1100 NE 45 St., Ste 300, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Bethany A TeachmanUniversity of Virginia, Department of Psychology, PO BOX 400400, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4400, USA.

Funding

Using Implicit Measures to Improve Prediction of Hazardous DrinkingR01AA021763 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LINDGREN, KRISTEN P · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
Testing Target Engagement and Effectiveness of Web-based Interpretation Training For AnxietyR34MH106770 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI TEACHMAN, BETHANY A · 2015 to 2016
$689k
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA021763NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH106770
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDrinking identity strength (how strongly one views oneself as a drinker) is a promising risk factor for hazardous drinking. A critical next step is to investigate whether the centrality of drinking identity (i.e., the relative importance of drinking vs. other identity domains, like well-being, relationships, education) also plays a role. Thus, we developed explicit and implicit measures of drinking identity centrality and evaluated them as predictors of hazardous drinking after controlling for explicit drinking identity strength.

methodsTwo studies were conducted (

resultsIn Study 1a, implicit and explicit centrality measures were positively and significantly associated with AUDIT scores after controlling for explicit drinking identity strength. There were no significant differences in the implicit measure variants, but the long format had slightly higher internal consistency. In Study 1b, results replicated for explicit, but not implicit, centrality.

conclusionsThese studies provide preliminary evidence that drinking identity centrality may be an important factor for predicting hazardous drinking. Future research should improve its measurement and evaluate implicit and explicit centrality in experimental and longitudinal studies.

Indexed as

drinking identitydrinking identity centralityexplicit drinking identityhazardous drinkingimplicit drinking identity

Identifiers

PMID28603766
PMCPMC5461972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.