Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28603716›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2017

Optimizing Nutrition in Preterm Low Birth Weight Infants-Consensus Summary.

R Kishore Kumar, Atul Singhal, Umesh Vaidya, Saswata Banerjee, Fahmina Anwar, Shashidhar Rao

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06047470 (Macronutrients in Lactating NICU Parents - Impact of Kangaroo Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 99 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06047470 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Macronutrients in Lactating NICU Parents - Impact of Kangaroo Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, DavisRan2023 to 2027Enrolled25ConditionsLactation Disorder With Baby Delivered, Nutrition Disorder, InfantArmsKangaroo Care, No Kangaroo Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 239 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Dietary Protein Intake, Breast Feeding and Growth in Human Milk Fed Preterm Infants.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

R Kishore KumarCloudnine Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Atul SinghalInstitute of Child Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Umesh VaidyaKEM Hospital, Pune, India.
Saswata BanerjeeNestle Nutrition, Kolkata, India.
Fahmina AnwarMedical and Scientific Affairs, Nestle Nutrition, South Asia Region, Gurgaon, India.
Shashidhar RaoMedical and Scientific Affairs, Nestle Nutrition, South Asia Region, Gurgaon, India.
Nestlé (India) · INCloudnine · INCollege of Medicine & JNM Hospital · INUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preterm birth survivors are at a higher risk of growth and developmental disabilities compared to their term counterparts. Development of strategies to lower the complications of preterm birth forms the rising need of the hour. Appropriate nutrition is essential for the growth and development of preterm infants. Early administration of optimal nutrition to preterm birth survivors lowers the risk of adverse health outcomes and improves cognition in adulthood. A group of neonatologists, pediatricians, and nutrition experts convened to discuss and frame evidence-based recommendations for optimizing nutrition in preterm low birth weight (LBW) infants. The following were the primary recommendations of the panel: (1) enteral feeding is safe and may be preferred to parenteral nutrition due to the complications associated with the latter; however, parenteral nutrition may be a useful adjunct to enteral feeding in some critical cases; (2) early, fast, or continuous enteral feeding yields better outcomes compared to late, slow, or intermittent feeding, respectively; (3) routine use of nasogastric tubes is not advisable; (4) preterm infants can be fed while on ventilator or continuous positive airway pressure; (5) routine evaluation of gastric residuals and abdominal girth should be avoided; (6) expressed breast milk (EBM) is the first choice for feeding preterm infants due to its beneficial effects on cardiovascular, neurological, bone health, and growth outcomes; the second choice is donor pasteurized human milk; (7) EBM or donor milk may be fortified with human milk fortifiers, without increasing the osmolality of the milk, to meet the high protein requirements of preterm infants; (8) standard fortification is effective and safe but does not fulfill the high protein needs; (9) use of targeted and adjustable fortification, where possible, helps provide optimal nutrition; (10) optimizing weight gain in preterm infants prevents long-term cardiovascular complications; (11) checking for optimal weight and sucking/swallowing ability is essential prior to discharge of preterm infants; and (12) appropriate counseling and regular follow-up and monitoring after discharge will help achieve better long-term health outcomes. This consensus summary serves as a useful guide to clinicians in addressing the challenges and providing optimal nutrition to preterm LBW infants.

Indexed as

donor pasteurized human milkenteral feedingexpressed breast milkfortificationoptimizing nutritionpreterm low birth weight infants

Identifiers

PMID28603716
PMCPMC5445116
OpenAlexW2620255774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.