Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28603469›Full record

ArticleThe journal for nurse practitioners : JNP2017

Using Fitness Trackers in Clinical Research: What Nurse Practitioners Need to Know.

Lisa Cadmus-Bertram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal for nurse practitioners : JNP, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Commentary: Is Wearable Fitness Technology a Medically Approved Device? Yes and No.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Estimating Walking Speed in the Wild.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lisa Cadmus-BertramDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin - Madison.

Funding

Sedentary Behavior and Breast Cancer: Interventions and BiomarkersK07CA178870 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CADMUSBERTRAM, LISA ANNE · 2014 to 2017
$547k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA178870
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumer-based wearable fitness trackers present a new array of opportunities and challenges to nurse practitioners engaged in health promotion research. Key advantages include the ability to provide continuous, objective, remote monitoring of physical activity and the potential to improve the efficacy of physical activity interventions. This paper provides an overview of fitness trackers, including their functions and accuracy, and addresses the following key issues to consider before using trackers in research: (1) when to use a fitness tracker; (2) choosing a brand and model; (3) encouraging good compliance; and (4) extracting and using the data.

Identifiers

PMID28603469
PMCPMC5464724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.