ArticleInternational journal of MS care
Spinal Cord as an Adjunct to Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Defining "No Evidence of Disease Activity" in Multiple Sclerosis.
Article in International journal of MS care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- MSpine: a prospective longitudinal study of spinal cord lesions in multiple sclerosis: MRI monitoring and prognostic factors for active disease. A study protocol.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- The no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) concept in MS: impact of spinal cord MRI.Journal of neurology · 2022Article
- Brain and spinal cord MRI lesions in primary progressive vs. relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.eNeurologicalSci · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Monitoring patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) for “no evidence of disease activity” (NEDA) may help guide disease-modifying therapy (DMT) management decisions. Whereas surveillance brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is common, the role of spinal cord monitoring for NEDA is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the role of brain and spinal cord 3T MRI in the 1-year evaluation of NEDA. Methods: Of 61 study patients (3 clinically isolated syndrome, 56 relapsing-remitting, 2 secondary progressive), 56 (91.8%) were receiving DMT. The MRI included brain fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and cervical/thoracic T2-weighted fast spin echo images. On MRI, NEDA was defined as the absence of new or enlarging T2 lesions at 1 year. Results: Thirty-nine patients (63.9%) achieved NEDA by brain MRI, only one of whom had spinal cord activity. This translates to a false-positive rate for NEDA based on the brain of 2.6% (95% CI, 0.1%–13.5%). Thirty-eight patients (62.3%) had NEDA by brain and spinal cord MRI. Fifty-five patients (90.2%) had NEDA by spinal cord MRI, 17 of whom had brain activity. Of the 22 patients (36.1%) with brain changes, 5 had spinal cord changes. No evidence of disease activity was sustained in 48.3% of patients at 1 year and was the same with the addition of spinal cord MRI. Patients with MRI activity in either the brain or the spinal cord only were more likely to have activity in the brain (P = .0001). Conclusions: Spinal cord MRI had a low diagnostic yield as an adjunct to brain MRI at 3T in monitoring patients with MS for NEDA over 1 year. Studies with larger data sets are needed to confirm these findings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.