Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28603314›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2017

Maternal and neonatal services in Ethiopia: measuring and improving quality.

Maureen E Canavan, Marie A Brault, Dawit Tatek, Daniel Burssa, Ayele Teshome, Erika Linnander, Elizabeth H Bradley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maureen E CanavanGlobal Health Leadership Institute, Yale University School of Public Health, 2 Church Street South, New Haven, Connecticut, 06519, United States of America.
Marie A BraultGlobal Health Leadership Institute, Yale University School of Public Health, 2 Church Street South, New Haven, Connecticut, 06519, United States of America.
Dawit TatekGlobal Health Leadership Institute, Yale University School of Public Health, 2 Church Street South, New Haven, Connecticut, 06519, United States of America.
Daniel BurssaFederal Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ayele TeshomeFederal Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Erika LinnanderGlobal Health Leadership Institute, Yale University School of Public Health, 2 Church Street South, New Haven, Connecticut, 06519, United States of America.
Elizabeth H BradleyGlobal Health Leadership Institute, Yale University School of Public Health, 2 Church Street South, New Haven, Connecticut, 06519, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problemMaternal and neonatal mortality remains high in low- and middle-income countries, with poor quality of intrapartum care as a barrier to further progress. APPROACH: We developed and tested a method of measuring the quality of maternal and neonatal care that could be embedded in a larger national performance management initiative. The tool used direct observations and medical record reviews to score quality in nine domains of intrapartum care. We piloted and evaluated the tool in visits to the 18 lead hospitals that have responsibility to promote and coordinate quality improvement efforts within a hospital cluster in Ethiopia. Between baseline and follow-up assessments, staff from a national quality collaborative alliance provided hospital-based training on labour and delivery services. LOCAL

settingEthiopia has invested in hospital quality improvement for more than a decade and this tool was integrated into existing quality improvement mechanisms within lead hospitals, with the potential for scale-up to all government hospitals. RELEVANT CHANGES: Significant improvements in quality of intrapartum care were detected from baseline (June-July 2015) to follow-up (February-March 2016) in targeted hospitals. The overall mean quality score rose from 65.6 (standard deviation, SD: 10.5) to 91.2 (SD: 12.4) out of 110 items ( LESSONS LEARNT: The method was feasible, requiring a total of 3 days and two to three trained data collectors per hospital visit. It produced data that detected substantial changes made during 8 months of national hospital quality improvement efforts. With additional replication studies, this tool may be useful in other low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementQuality Indicators, Health CareEthiopiaFemaleHumansInfant HealthMaternal Health ServicesMedical AuditObservationPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID28603314
PMCPMC5463811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.