ReviewNeuroImage2018
In vivo B
Review in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed, 135 citations in OpenAlex.
- Servo Navigation and Phase Equalization Enhanced by Run-Time Stabilization (PEERS) for 3D EPI Time Series.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Field-Based Spatial Self-Registration of Multicoil Hardware for BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Correcting motion-related BScientific reports · 2026Article
- Motion- and Field-Robust Mesoscopic Whole-BrainMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Testing circuit-level theories of consciousness in humans.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2026Review
- Single spin exact gradients for the optimization of complex pulses and pulse sequences.Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2026Article
- Improving magnetic field homogeneity in prostate MR imaging and spectroscopy using an add-on local external shim coil array.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Enhancing cardiac MRI reliability at 3 T using motion-adaptive BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Study protocol for the Champaign-Urbana population study.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2026Article
- Cerebellar imaging for neuroscience at 9.4 T.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Accelerated Navigator for Rapid ∆BNMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Advanced preclinical functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brain.Npj imaging · 2025Review
- Dynamic BMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Single-shot echo planar time-resolved imaging for multi-echo functional MRI and distortion-free diffusion imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Leveraging ultra-high field (7T) MRI in psychiatric research.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Article
- Advancements in MR hardware systems and magnetic field control: BPsychoradiology · 2024Review
- Exploring methodological frontiers in laminar fMRI.Psychoradiology · 2024Review
- Automated High-Order Shimming for Neuroimaging Studies.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- Improved dynamic distortion correction for fMRI using single-echo EPI and a readout-reversed first image (REFILL).Human brain mapping · 2023Article
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Functional MRI (fMRI) at 7T and above provides improved Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Contrast-to-Noise Ratio compared to 3T acquisitions. In addition to the beneficial effects on spin polarization and magnetization of deoxyhemoglobin, the increased applied field also further magnetizes air and tissue. While the magnets themselves typically provide a static B
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.