ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2017
Simple and reproducible approaches for the collection of select porcine ganglia.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of cholinergic cells with chemosensory traits in the porcine uterus.Cell and tissue research · 2022Article
- Age-Dependent Invasion of Pseudorabies Virus into Porcine Central Nervous System via Maxillary Nerve.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Long-term culturing of porcine nodose ganglia.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2020Article
- Article
- Sex-specific airway hyperreactivity and sex-specific transcriptome remodeling in neonatal piglets challenged with intra-airway acid.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2019Article
- The vagal ganglia transcriptome identifies candidate therapeutics for airway hyperreactivity.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe anatomy and physiology of the pig nervous system is more similar to humans compared to traditional rodent models. This makes the pig an attractive model to answer questions relating to human health and disease. Yet the technical and molecular tools available to pig researchers are limited compared to rodent researchers. NEW
methodWe developed simple and rapid methods to isolate the trigeminal, nodose (distal vagal), and dorsal root ganglia from neonatal pigs. We selected these ganglia due to their broad applicability to basic science researchers and clinicians.
resultsUse of these methods resulted in reproducible isolation of all three types of ganglia as validated by histological examination. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): There are currently no methods that describe a step-by-step protocol to isolate these porcine ganglia.
conclusionsIn conclusion, these methods for ganglia collection will facilitate and accelerate future neuroscience investigations in pig models of human disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.