Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28602612›Full record

ArticleStem cell reports2017

Lineage Reprogramming of Astroglial Cells from Different Origins into Distinct Neuronal Subtypes.

Malek Chouchane, Ana Raquel Melo de Farias, Daniela Maria de Sousa Moura, Markus Michael Hilscher, Timm Schroeder, Richardson Naves Leão, Marcos Romualdo Costa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Circuit formation in the adult brain.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Direct In Vitro Reprogramming of Astrocytes into Induced Neurons.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Neuronal Reprogramming for Tissue Repair and Neuroregeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Direct reprogramming into interneurons: potential for brain repair.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Malek ChouchaneBrain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59056-450, Brazil.
Ana Raquel Melo de FariasBrain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59056-450, Brazil.
Daniela Maria de Sousa MouraBrain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59056-450, Brazil.
Markus Michael HilscherBrain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59056-450, Brazil.
Timm SchroederDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Mattenstrasse 26, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Richardson Naves LeãoBrain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59056-450, Brazil.
Marcos Romualdo CostaBrain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59056-450, Brazil. Electronic address: mrcosta@neuro.ufrn.br.
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · BRETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Astroglial cells isolated from the rodent postnatal cerebral cortex are particularly susceptible to lineage reprogramming into neurons. However, it remains unknown whether other astroglial populations retain the same potential. Likewise, little is known about the fate of induced neurons (iNs) in vivo. In this study we addressed these questions using two different astroglial populations isolated from the postnatal brain reprogrammed either with Neurogenin-2 (Neurog2) or Achaete scute homolog-1 (Ascl1). We show that cerebellum (CerebAstro) and cerebral cortex astroglia (CtxAstro) generates iNs with distinctive neurochemical and morphological properties. Both astroglial populations contribute iNs to the olfactory bulb following transplantation in the postnatal and adult mouse subventricular zone. However, only CtxAstro transfected with Neurog2 differentiate into pyramidal-like iNs after transplantation in the postnatal cerebral cortex. Altogether, our data indicate that the origin of the astroglial population and transcription factors used for reprogramming, as well as the region of integration, affect the fate of iNs.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingAnimalsAstrocytesBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCell LineageCells, CulturedCerebral CortexMiceNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuronsTransfectionAscl1 protein, mouseBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsNeurog2 protein, mouseastroglial cellscell transplantationcerebellumcerebral cortexinduced neuronslineage reprogrammingproneural genes

Identifiers

PMID28602612
PMCPMC5511102
OpenAlexW2624192991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.