Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28602547›Full record

ReviewContact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association2017

Non-invasive objective and contemporary methods for measuring ocular surface inflammation in soft contact lens wearers - A review.

Cecilia Chao, Kathryn Richdale, Isabelle Jalbert, Kim Doung, Moneisha Gokhale

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dry Eye Disease and Tear Cytokine Levels-A Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Recent advances in smart contact lenses.Biosensors & bioelectronics: X · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of CelligentDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Comparative Evaluation ofVision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessment of goblet cell size and density in relation to epithelial cell (multi)layering on conjunctival impression cytology samples.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. New approaches for diagnosis of dry eye disease.International journal of ophthalmology · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cecilia ChaoCollege of Optometry, State University of New York, New York, USA; School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Kathryn RichdaleCollege of Optometry, State University of New York, New York, USA.
Isabelle JalbertSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Kim DoungCollege of Optometry, State University of New York, New York, USA.
Moneisha GokhaleDeakin Optometry, Deakin University, 75 Pigdons Road, Waurn Ponds, Victoria, 3216, Australia. Electronic address: moneisha.gokhale@deakin.edu.au.
SUNY College of Optometry · USDeakin University · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

Short-term Training Students in Health Professional SchoolsT35EY020481 · NEI · STATE COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY · PI Stewart Allen Bloomfield · 2010 to 2026
$780k
NEI NIH HHS T35 EY020481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contact lens wear is one of the primary risk factors for the development of ocular surface inflammatory events. The purpose of this review is to examine and summarize existing knowledge on the mechanisms of contact lens related ocular surface inflammation and the evidence for the effectiveness of current objective methods to measure ocular surface inflammation. Contact lens wear is postulated to trigger an inflammatory response on the ocular surface due to mechanical, chemical, hypoxic stress, or by the introduction of microbes and their toxins. Apart from the traditional signs of inflammation, such as swelling, oedema, redness and heat, on the ocular surface, other methods to measure ocular surface inflammation in sub-clinical levels include tear inflammatory mediator concentrations, conjunctival cell morphology, and corneal epithelial dendritic cell density and morphology. Tear inflammatory mediator concentrations are up- or down-regulated during contact lens wear, with or without the presence of associated inflammatory events. There is higher conjunctival cell metaplasia observed with contact lens wear, but changes in goblet cell density are inconclusive. Dendritic cell density is seen to increase soon after initiating soft contact lens wear. The long term effects of contact lens wear on dendritic cell migration in the cornea and conjunctiva, including the lid wiper area, require further investigation. Currently patient factors, such as age, smoking, systemic diseases and genetic profile are being studied. A better understanding of these mechanisms may facilitate the development of new management options and strategies to minimize ocular surface inflammation related to contact lens wear.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalConjunctival DiseasesContact Lenses, HydrophilicCorneal DiseasesCytokinesEye ProteinsHumansInflammationTearsCytokinesEye Proteinstear proteinsconjunctival cell morphologycontact lens wear, tear cytokinedendritic cells, ocular surface inflammation

Identifiers

PMID28602547
PMCPMC7197092
OpenAlexW2622712965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.