Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28602520›Full record

Observational studyOphthalmology2017

Decreased Visual Function Scores on a Low Luminance Questionnaire Is Associated with Impaired Dark Adaptation.

Mohammad Yazdanie, Jason Alvarez, Elvira Agrón, Wai T Wong, Henry E Wiley, Frederick L Ferris, Emily Y Chew, Catherine Cukras

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Visual Function Assessment in Geographic Atrophy: A Review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammad YazdanieNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jason AlvarezNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Elvira AgrónNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Wai T WongNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Henry E WileyNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Frederick L FerrisNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Emily Y ChewNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Catherine CukrasNational Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Electronic address: cukrasc@nei.nih.gov.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Longitudinal Investigation of Dark Adaptation in Participants with AMDZIAEY000509 · NEI · NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE · PI CUKRAS, CATHERINE · 2011 to 2025
$2.5M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA EY000509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe investigate whether responses on a Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ) in patients with a range of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) severity are associated with their performance on focal dark adaptation (DA) testing and with choroidal thickness.

designCross-sectional, single-center, observational study.

participantsA total of 113 participants older than 50 years of age with a range of AMD severity.

methodsParticipants answered the LLQ on the same day they underwent DA testing using a focal dark adaptometer measuring rod intercept time (RIT). We performed univariable and multivariable analyses of the LLQ scores and age, RIT, AMD severity, subfoveal choroidal thickness [SFCT], phakic status, and best-corrected visual acuity.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome of this study was the score on the 32-question LLQ. Each item in the LLQ is designated to 1 of 6 subscales describing functional problems in low luminance: driving, emotional distress, mobility, extreme lighting, peripheral vision, and general dim lighting. Scores were computed for each subscale, in addition to a weighted total mean score.

resultsResponses from 113 participants (mean age, 76.2±9.3 years; 58.4% were female) and 113 study eyes were analyzed. Univariable analysis demonstrated that lower scores on all LLQ subscales were correlated with prolonged DA testing (longer RIT) and decreased choroidal thickness. All associations were statistically significant except for the association of choroidal thickness and "peripheral vision." The strongest association was the LLQ subscale of driving with RIT (r =-0.97, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis for each of the LLQ subscale outcomes, adjusted for age, included RIT, with total LLQ score, "driving," "extreme lighting," and "mobility" also including choroidal thickness. In all multivariable analyses, RIT had a stronger association than choroidal thickness.

conclusionsThis cross-sectional analysis demonstrates associations of patient-reported functional deficits, as assessed on the LLQ, with both reduced DA and reduced choroidal thickness, in a population of older adults with varying degrees of AMD severity and good visual acuity in at least 1 eye. These analyses suggest that local functional measurements of DA testing (RIT) and choroidal thickness are associated with patient-reported functional deficits.

Indexed as

LightAgedAged, 80 and overChoroidCross-Sectional StudiesDark AdaptationFemaleHumansMacular DegenerationMaleMiddle AgedNight VisionSurveys and QuestionnairesVision DisordersVision, OcularVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID28602520
PMCPMC8279728
OpenAlexW2623682195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.