Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28601965›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2017

Event-related potentials reflect impaired temporal interval learning following haloperidol administration.

Sarah E Forster, Patrick Zirnheld, Anantha Shekhar, Stuart R Steinhauer, Brian F O'Donnell, William P Hetrick

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah E ForsterDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA. sarah.forster2@va.gov.
Patrick ZirnheldDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Anantha ShekharDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Stuart R SteinhauerVA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, VISN 4 MIRECC, University Drive C, Building 30, Pittsburgh, USA.
Brian F O'DonnellDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
William P HetrickDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Indiana University Bloomington · USIndiana University School of MedicineVA Healthcare-VISN 4 · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSignals carried by the mesencephalic dopamine system and conveyed to anterior cingulate cortex are critically implicated in probabilistic reward learning and performance monitoring. A common evaluative mechanism purportedly subserves both functions, giving rise to homologous medial frontal negativities in feedback- and response-locked event-related brain potentials (the feedback-related negativity (FRN) and the error-related negativity (ERN), respectively), reflecting dopamine-dependent prediction error signals to unexpectedly negative events. Consistent with this model, the dopamine receptor antagonist, haloperidol, attenuates the ERN, but effects on FRN have not yet been evaluated.

methodsERN and FRN were recorded during a temporal interval learning task (TILT) following randomized, double-blind administration of haloperidol (3 mg; n = 18), diphenhydramine (an active control for haloperidol; 25 mg; n = 20), or placebo (n = 21) to healthy controls. Centroparietal positivities, the Pe and feedback-locked P300, were also measured and correlations between ERP measures and behavioral indices of learning, overall accuracy, and post-error compensatory behavior were evaluated. We hypothesized that haloperidol would reduce ERN and FRN, but that ERN would uniquely track automatic, error-related performance adjustments, while FRN would be associated with learning and overall accuracy.

resultsAs predicted, ERN was reduced by haloperidol and in those exhibiting less adaptive post-error performance; however, these effects were limited to ERNs following fast timing errors. In contrast, the FRN was not affected by drug condition, although increased FRN amplitude was associated with improved accuracy. Significant drug effects on centroparietal positivities were also absent.

conclusionsOur results support a functional and neurobiological dissociation between the ERN and FRN.

Indexed as

RewardAdultBrainBrain MappingDopamine AntagonistsDouble-Blind MethodElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHaloperidolHumansLearningMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultDopamine AntagonistsHaloperidolAntipsychoticControlDopamineERPsLearningTiming

Identifiers

PMID28601965
OpenAlexW2622934951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.