Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28601914›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2017

Left ventricular ejection fraction as therapeutic target: is it the ideal marker?

V Katsi, G Georgiopoulos, A Laina, E Koutli, J Parissis, C Tsioufis, P Nihoyannopoulos, D Tousoulis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Area-weighted unipolar voltage to predict heart failure outcomes in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

V Katsi1st Cardiology Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, University Medical School, Hippokration Hospital, Vasilissis Sofias 114, 11528, Athens, Greece.
G Georgiopoulos1st Cardiology Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, University Medical School, Hippokration Hospital, Vasilissis Sofias 114, 11528, Athens, Greece. georgiopoulosgeorgios@gmail.com.
A Laina1st Cardiology Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, University Medical School, Hippokration Hospital, Vasilissis Sofias 114, 11528, Athens, Greece.
E Koutli1st Cardiology Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, University Medical School, Hippokration Hospital, Vasilissis Sofias 114, 11528, Athens, Greece.
J Parissis1st Cardiology Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, University Medical School, Hippokration Hospital, Vasilissis Sofias 114, 11528, Athens, Greece.
C Tsioufis1st Cardiology Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, University Medical School, Hippokration Hospital, Vasilissis Sofias 114, 11528, Athens, Greece.
P Nihoyannopoulos1st Cardiology Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, University Medical School, Hippokration Hospital, Vasilissis Sofias 114, 11528, Athens, Greece.
D Tousoulis1st Cardiology Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, University Medical School, Hippokration Hospital, Vasilissis Sofias 114, 11528, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) consists the fastest growing clinical cardiac disease. HF patients are categorized on the basis of underlying left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) into HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), reduced LVEF (HFrEF), and mid-range LVEF (HFmrEF). While LVEF is the most commonly used surrogate marker of left ventricular (LV) systolic function, the implementation of two-dimensional echocardiography in estimating this parameter imposes certain caveats on current HF classification. Most importantly, LVEF could fluctuate in repeated measurements or even recover after treatment, thus blunting the borders between proposed categories of HF and enabling upward classification of patients. Under this prism, we sought to summarize possible procedures to improve systolic function in patients with HFrEF either naturally or by the means of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatment and devices. Therefore, we reviewed established pharmacotherapy, including beta-blockers, inhibitors of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis, statins, and digoxin as well as novel treatments like sacubitril-valsartan, ranolazine, and ivabradine. In addition, we assessed evidence in favor of cardiac resynchronization therapy and exercise training programs. Finally, innovative therapeutic strategies, including stem cells, xanthine oxidase inhibitors, antibiotic regimens, and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, were also taken into consideration. We concluded that LVEF is subject to changes in HF after intervention and besides the aforementioned HFrEF, HFpEF, and HFmrEF categories, a new entity of HF patients with recovered LVEF should be acknowledged. An improved global and refined LV function assessment by sophisticated imaging modalities and circulating biomarkers is expected to render HF classification more accurate and indicate patients with viable-yet dysfunctional-myocardium and favorable characteristics as the ideal candidates for LVEF recovery by individualized HF therapy.

Indexed as

Stroke VolumeCardiac Resynchronization TherapyExercise ToleranceHeart FailureHumansVentricular Function, Leftcardiac resynchronization therapydevicesdrugsexercise toleranceheart failure with preserved ejection fractionheart failure with reduced ejection fractionincrease ejection fractionrecovered ejection fraction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.