ArticlePreventive medicine2017
Intentional outdoor tanning in the United States: Results from the 2015 Summer ConsumerStyles survey.
Article in Preventive medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Skin cancer prevention behaviors, beliefs, distress, and worry among hispanics in Florida and Puerto Rico.BMC public health · 2023Trial
- "It just happens": A qualitative analysis of unintentional tanning behaviors.Journal of American college health : J of ACH · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Skin Aging Simulation as a Novel Skin Cancer Prevention.Dermatology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Observational
- The phenomenon of phototoxicity and long-term risks of commonly prescribed and structurally diverse drugs.Journal of photochemistry and photobiology · 2024Article
- Validity of a Self-Assessment Skin Tone Palette Compared to a Colorimeter for Characterizing Skin Color for Skin Cancer Research.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Behaviors and Knowledge Related to Intentional Outdoor Tanning Among Adults in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia.Cureus · 2022Article
- Nationwide Analysis on Intentional Indoor and Outdoor Tanning: Prevalence and Correlates.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Sunburn frequency and risk and protective factors: a cross-sectional survey.Dermatology online journal · 2021Article
- Indoor Tanning Trends Among US Adults, 2007-2018.American journal of public health · 2020Article
- Outdoor workers' perceptions of skin cancer risk and attitudes to sun-protective measures: A qualitative study.Journal of occupational health · 2020Article
- Trending on Pinterest: an examination of pins about skin tanning.Translational behavioral medicine · 2019Article
- Prevalence and correlates of intentional outdoor and indoor tanning among adolescents in the United States: Findings from the FLASHE survey.Preventive medicine reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
There is limited literature about adults in the United States who usually or always spend time outdoors for the purpose of developing a tan, defined as intentional outdoor tanning. Using data from the 2015 Summer ConsumerStyles, an online cross-sectional survey weighted to the US adult population (n=4,127), we performed unadjusted and adjusted multivariable logistic regressions to examine the associations between demographic characteristics, behaviors, and belief factors related to skin cancer risk and intentional outdoor tanning. Nearly 10% of the study population intentionally tanned outdoors. Outdoor tanning was more prevalent among women (11.4%), non-Hispanic white individuals (11.5%), those aged 18-29years (14.1%), those without a high school diploma (12.7%), and those in the northeast United States (13.2%). The adjusted odds of outdoor tanning were significantly higher among women than men (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-2.04); those with a history of indoor tanning or recent sunburn than those without (AOR 2.61, CI 1.94-3.51; AOR 1.96, CI 1.46-2.63, respectively); those who agreed they looked better with a tan than those who did not (AOR 6.69, CI 3.62-12.35); and those who did not try to protect their skin from the sun when outdoors than those who did (AOR 2.17, CI 1.56-3.04). Adults who engaged in other risky behaviors that expose a person to ultraviolet (UV) radiation were more likely to tan outdoors, further increasing their risk of skin cancer. These findings may guide potential interventions to reduce UV exposure from outdoor tanning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.