Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28601226›Full record

ReviewThe Enzymes

The Evolution of Substrate Specificity by tRNA Modification Enzymes.

Katherine M McKenney, Mary Anne T Rubio, Juan D Alfonzo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Enzymes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emergence of biosignatures on Earth and implications for life detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. tRNA mbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. RNA Methylation in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  13. Adaptation of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine M McKenneyDepartment of Microbiology, Ohio State Biochemistry Program, The Center for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Mary Anne T RubioDepartment of Microbiology, Ohio State Biochemistry Program, The Center for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Juan D AlfonzoDepartment of Microbiology, Ohio State Biochemistry Program, The Center for RNA Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States. Electronic address: alfonzo.1@osu.edu.
The Ohio State University · US

Funding

tRNA editing by deamination: Balancing affinity and specifictyR01GM084065 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ALFONZO, JUAN D · 2008 to 2021
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All types of nucleic acids in cells undergo naturally occurring chemical modifications, including DNA, rRNA, mRNA, snRNA, and most prominently tRNA. Over 100 different modifications have been described and every position in the purine and pyrimidine bases can be modified; often the sugar is also modified [1]. In tRNA, the function of modifications varies; some modulate global and/or local RNA structure, and others directly impact decoding and may be essential for viability. Whichever the case, the overall importance of modifications is highlighted by both their evolutionary conservation and the fact that organisms use a substantial portion of their genomes to encode modification enzymes, far exceeding what is needed for the de novo synthesis of the canonical nucleotides themselves [2]. Although some modifications occur at exactly the same nucleotide position in tRNAs from the three domains of life, many can be found at various positions in a particular tRNA and their location may vary between and within different tRNAs. With this wild array of chemical diversity and substrate specificities, one of the big challenges in the tRNA modification field has been to better understand at a molecular level the modes of substrate recognition by the different modification enzymes; in this realm RNA binding rests at the heart of the problem. This chapter will focus on several examples of modification enzymes where their mode of RNA binding is well understood; from these, we will try to draw general conclusions and highlight growing themes that may be applicable to the RNA modification field at large.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalEnzymesRNA, TransferSubstrate SpecificityEnzymesRNA, TransferEditingMethylationPseudouridineRNA binding

Identifiers

PMID28601226
PMCPMC6589034
OpenAlexW2609900376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.