Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28600855›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2018

Predicting future major depression and persistent depressive symptoms: Development of a prognostic screener and PHQ-4 cutoffs in breast cancer patients.

Karen L Weihs, Joshua F Wiley, Catherine M Crespi, Jennifer L Krull, Annette L Stanton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Associations of patient-reported care satisfaction with symptom burden and healthcare use in hospitalized patients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karen L WeihsDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5985-8560
Joshua F WileySchool of Psychological Sciences and Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences, Monash University, Australia.
Catherine M CrespiDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jennifer L KrullDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Annette L StantonDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

Women's CancersP30CA016042 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Samuel Wheeler French · 1985 to 2026
$134.5M
VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Dan Theodorescu · 1985 to 2026
$110.2M
Emotion Regulation and Depression in Breast Cancer SurvivorshipR01CA133081 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI STANTON, ANNETTE L, WEIHS, KAREN L. · 2009 to 2014
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016042NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023074NCI NIH HHS R01 CA133081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCreate a brief, self-report screener for recently diagnosed breast cancer patients to identify patients at risk of future depression.

methodsBreast cancer patients (N = 410) within 2 ± 1 months after diagnosis provided data on depression vulnerability. Depression outcomes were defined as a high depressive symptom trajectory or a major depressive episode during 16 months after diagnosis. Stochastic gradient boosting of regression trees identified 7 items highly predictive for the depression outcomes from a pool of 219 candidate depression vulnerability items. Three of the 7 items were from the Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4), a validated screener for current anxiety/depressive disorder that has not been tested to identify risk for future depression. Thresholds classifying patients as high or low risk on the new Depression Risk Questionnaire 7 (DRQ-7) and the PHQ-4 were obtained. Predictive performance of the DRQ-7 and PHQ-4 was assessed on a holdout validation subsample.

findingsDRQ-7 items assess loneliness, irritability, persistent sadness, and low acceptance of emotion as well as 3 items from the PHQ-4 (anhedonia, depressed mood, and worry). A DRQ-7 score of ≥6/23 identified depression outcomes with 0.73 specificity, 0.83 sensitivity, 0.68 positive predictive value, and 0.86 negative predictive value. A PHQ-4 score of ≥3/12 performed moderately well but less accurately than the DRQ-7 (net reclassification improvement = 10%; 95% CI [0.5-16]).

interpretationThe DRQ-7 and the PHQ-4 with a new cutoff score are clinically accessible screeners for risk of depression in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Use of the screener to select patients for preventive interventions awaits validation of the screener in other samples.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsDepressionFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMajor Depressive DisorderMiddle AgedPatient Health QuestionnairePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSensitivity and Specificitybreast cancerdepressive disorderdepressive symptomsemotion acceptanceoncologyprognosticriskscreener

Identifiers

PMID28600855
PMCPMC6531034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.