Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28600826›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational chemistry2017

Tinker-OpenMM: Absolute and relative alchemical free energies using AMOEBA on GPUs.

Matthew Harger, Daniel Li, Zhi Wang, Kevin Dalby, Louis Lagardère, Jean-Philip Piquemal, Jay Ponder, Pengyu Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Polarizable Water Potential Derived from a Model Electron Density.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthew HargerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78712.ORCID 0000-0002-7499-2343
Daniel LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78712.
Zhi WangDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, 63130.
Kevin DalbyDivision of Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78712.
Louis LagardèreInstitut des Sciences du Calcul et des Données, UPMC Université Paris 06, F-75005, Paris, France.
Jean-Philip PiquemalLaboratoire de Chimie Théorique, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC, UMR7616 CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6615-9426
Jay PonderDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, 63130.
Pengyu RenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 78712.

Funding

DEVELOPMENT OF A NEXT-GENERATION NUCLEIC ACID FORCE FIELDR01GM106137 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JAY PONDER, Pengyu Ren · 2013 to 2026
$3.5M
Specificity and Selectivity in Protein-Ion BindingR01GM114237 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PONDER, JAY, REN, PENGYU · 2015 to 2023
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM106137NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capabilities of the polarizable force fields for alchemical free energy calculations have been limited by the high computational cost and complexity of the underlying potential energy functions. In this work, we present a GPU-based general alchemical free energy simulation platform for polarizable potential AMOEBA. Tinker-OpenMM, the OpenMM implementation of the AMOEBA simulation engine has been modified to enable both absolute and relative alchemical simulations on GPUs, which leads to a ∼200-fold improvement in simulation speed over a single CPU core. We show that free energy values calculated using this platform agree with the results of Tinker simulations for the hydration of organic compounds and binding of host-guest systems within the statistical errors. In addition to absolute binding, we designed a relative alchemical approach for computing relative binding affinities of ligands to the same host, where a special path was applied to avoid numerical instability due to polarization between the different ligands that bind to the same site. This scheme is general and does not require ligands to have similar scaffolds. We show that relative hydration and binding free energy calculated using this approach match those computed from the absolute free energy approach. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Computer GraphicsModels, ChemicalMolecular Dynamics SimulationThermodynamicsLigandsLigandsAMOEBAfree energy calculationgraphics processing unitsOpenMMTinker

Identifiers

PMID28600826
PMCPMC5539969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.